The International Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property was first signed in Paris in 1883. The document itself is known as the Paris Convention. The convention has been revised many times and its current language encompasses patents, trademarks, and industrial designs. As of November 2008, there were 173 contracting parties to the Paris Convention.
The Paris Convention established some important international protocols to deal with multi-national patent filings. It both protects some rights of those who file international applications, and governs procedure for how signatory states should treat these patent filings. Most importantly, the Paris Convention included the vital concept of “priority". This means that under the Paris Convention, patent applicants are granted the date of their first filing as the active application date for patent applications in all additional Paris Union countries, for up to 12 months after filing the original application.
Another useful function of the Paris Convention treaty is that it contains provisions to ensure that intellectual property holders who are non-residents and non-nationals of a Paris Union country are given the same expectations and rights under the law as nationals of said country.Keywords: Washington Assignment of Pending Application, sole inventor, Paris Convention, types Detailed Description: The Washington Assignment of Pending Application by Sole Inventor, as per the guidelines set by the Paris Convention, allows a sole inventor to assign or transfer their pending patent application rights to another party or entity. This assignment is governed by specific rules and requirements outlined in Washington state law, adhering to the principles and provisions set forth by the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. There are different types of Washington Assignment of Pending Application by Sole Inventor — Paris Convention, each addressing specific situations and conditions. These types may include: 1. Complete Assignment: This type involves the transfer of all rights and interests in the pending patent application from the sole inventor to another party or entity. By opting for a complete assignment, the sole inventor relinquishes all ownership and control over the application, including the right to make decisions related to prosecution, licensing, and enforcement. 2. Partial Assignment: In certain situations, a sole inventor may choose to assign only a portion of their rights and interests in the pending application. This type of assignment allows the inventor to retain certain rights, such as decision-making authority or the right to receive a percentage of any future royalties or licensing fees. 3. Exclusive Assignment: An exclusive assignment grants the assignee the sole right to exploit and commercially use the pending application. This means that the sole inventor cannot grant rights or licenses to any other party without the assignee's consent. This type of assignment often involves a contractual agreement outlining the terms, conditions, and duration of exclusivity. 4. Non-Exclusive Assignment: In contrast to an exclusive assignment, a non-exclusive assignment allows the sole inventor to grant rights and licenses to multiple parties simultaneously. The assignee gains certain rights to use and commercially exploit the pending application, but the sole inventor retains the freedom to grant similar rights to others without any restrictions. It is crucial for sole inventors considering the Washington Assignment of Pending Application to carefully evaluate their unique circumstances and consult legal professionals specializing in intellectual property law to ensure compliance with the Paris Convention and Washington state regulations. Additionally, the specific terms and conditions of the assignment, such as compensation and duration, need to be clearly defined in a written agreement to protect all parties involved.
