Nevada Peremptory Challenge of Judge

State:
Nevada
Control #:
NV-SKU-1115
Format:
PDF
Instant download
This website is not affiliated with any governmental entity
Public form
Sorry, the form is currently unavailable.Try our extended search for alternatives that meet your needs.

Description

Peremptory Challenge of Judge

A Nevada Peremptory Challenge of Judge is a legal procedure used to challenge the impartiality of a judge in a court case. It is a motion for the disqualification of a judge based on the assertion that the judge cannot be impartial and objective in the case. This challenge must be made by the party filing the challenge and must be based on facts that can be proven. The challenge may be made on the grounds of bias, prejudice, or any other factor that could affect the impartiality of the judge. There are two types of Nevada Peremptory Challenge of Judge: a statutory challenge and a non-statutory challenge. A statutory challenge is based on the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) and is used to challenge a judge’s disqualification based on certain statutory criteria, such as bias or prejudice. A non-statutory challenge is used to challenge a judge’s disqualification based on other factors, such as a close relationship between the judge and a party to the case.

Form popularity

FAQ

Rule 42 - Consolidation; Separate Trials (a)Consolidation. If actions before the court involve a common question of law or fact, the court may: (1) join for hearing or trial any or all matters at issue in the actions; (2) consolidate the actions; or (3) issue any other orders to avoid unnecessary cost or delay.

A party wishing to exercise the right to change of judge shall file a pleading entitled "Peremptory Challenge of Judge." The notice may be signed by a party or by an attorney, it shall state the name of the judge to be changed, and it shall neither specify grounds, nor be accompanied by an affidavit.

A motion to file a brief that exceeds the applicable page limit or type-volume limitation will be granted only upon a showing of diligence and good cause. The court will not consider the cost of preparing and revising the brief in ruling on the motion.

In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a person the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized to do so by law or a court order.

Rule 42 - Voluntary Dismissal (a) Reserved. (b) Dismissal in the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals. The Clerk may dismiss an appeal or other proceeding if the parties file a signed dismissal agreement specifying how costs are to be paid and pay any fees that are due.

Each party is entitled to two peremptory challenges. Either party may challenge for cause on any grounds set forth in NRS 16.050. NRS 67.040 Challenges for cause tried by court. Challenges for cause must be tried by the justice.

Interest and Damages. 1. If a judgment for money in a civil case is affirmed, any interest allowed by law is payable from the date the judgment under review was entered.

2.47. Unless otherwise provided for in an order of the court, all motions in limine to exclude or admit evidence must be in writing and filed not less than 45 days prior to the date set for trial and must be heard not less than 14 days prior to trial.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Nevada Peremptory Challenge of Judge