Arizona Jury Instruction - 1.9.5.2 Subsidiary As Alter Ego Of Parent Corporation

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-11CF-1-9-5-2
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.

Arizona Jury Instruction — 1.9.5.2 Subsidiary as Alter Ego of Parent Corporation is a legal instruction used in civil litigation cases in Arizona. This instruction addresses the concept of "alter ego," where a subsidiary corporation can be treated as the alter ego of its parent corporation, thereby holding the parent corporation liable for the subsidiary's actions and debts. In cases where the plaintiff alleges that the subsidiary corporation is the alter ego of the parent corporation, it is crucial to establish certain elements. These elements might include a showing that the parent corporation exercises such control over the subsidiary's operations and activities that it effectively eliminates the subsidiary's separate identity. Additionally, evidence might need to be presented that demonstrates the subsidiary exists solely as a means for the parent corporation to avoid liability or to engage in fraudulent practices. Different types of Arizona Jury Instruction — 1.9.5.2 Subsidiary as Alter Ego of Parent Corporation may include the following: 1. Complete domination: This type of alter ego theory asserts that the parent corporation has full control over the subsidiary's operations and consistently exercises that control, making the subsidiary a mere instrumentality or façade for the parent corporation. 2. Unity of interest and ownership: This alter ego theory asserts that there is an overlap or commingling of ownership and interests between the parent and subsidiary corporations. It suggests that the subsidiary does not function as a separate entity but rather as an extension of the parent corporation. 3. Injustice or fraudulent intent: This variation of alter ego theory argues that the parent corporation established the subsidiary with the purpose of engaging in fraudulent activities, avoiding liabilities, or perpetrating injustices on third parties. Evidence of fraud, misuse of subsidiary funds, or hidden corporate transactions might support this theory. Please note that this description is only a general overview of Arizona Jury Instruction — 1.9.5.2 Subsidiary as Alter Ego of Parent Corporation. The exact language and elements may vary depending on the specific case and any new developments in Arizona law. Therefore, it is essential to consult the most up-to-date instructions and consult with legal professionals when applying this instruction in litigation.