Nebraska Jury Instruction — Withdrawal FroConspiracyac— - For Use With General Conspiracy Charge In the state of Nebraska, withdrawal from a conspiracy is a significant legal defense available to individuals who were initially involved in a conspiracy but have voluntarily taken steps to terminate their participation. A Nebraska jury instruction specifically addresses this defense and provides guidance to the jury when deciding the guilt or innocence of an accused individual. The purpose of the Nebraska Jury Instruction — Withdrawal FroConspiracyac— - For Use With General Conspiracy Charge is to ensure that the jury is aware of the legal principle surrounding withdrawal from a conspiracy and how it may impact the defendant's liability. The instruction clarifies that if a conspirator withdraws from a conspiracy before the completion of the conspiracy's objective, they should not be held responsible for the acts committed by the remaining members of the conspiracy. Keywords: Nebraska, jury instruction, withdrawal from conspiracy, general conspiracy charge, legal defense, voluntary termination, participation, guilt or innocence, accused individual, legal principle, liability, conspirator, completion, objective, responsible, remaining members. Different Types of Nebraska Jury Instruction — Withdrawal FroConspiracyac— - For Use With General Conspiracy Charge: 1. Withdrawal Before the Completion of the Conspiracy: This type of withdrawal occurs when a conspirator voluntarily ceases their involvement in the conspiracy before the completion of its objective. The instruction emphasizes that if the defendant proves they made a genuine effort to withdraw and notified all other conspirators about their decision, they should not be held accountable for subsequent acts performed by the conspirators. 2. Withdrawal and Taking Affirmative Action to Defeat the Purpose: This type of withdrawal encompasses situations where a conspirator not only ends their participation in the conspiracy but also takes affirmative steps to prevent the accomplishment of the conspiracy's intended objective. The jury instruction highlights that if the defendant proves their withdrawal was genuine, and they actively worked against the conspiracy's purpose, they should not be considered liable for the actions of the other conspirators. 3. Partial Withdrawal: Partial withdrawal refers to instances where a conspirator, although withdrawing from certain aspects of the conspiracy, remains involved in other aspects. The jury instruction clarifies that partial withdrawal does not absolve the defendant of liability for the specific acts they continue to participate in, but it may limit their liability for the overall conspiracy. 4. Timing of Withdrawal: This type of instruction underscores the importance of the timing of the withdrawal. It explains that the defendant must prove that their withdrawal occurred before the commission of any overt acts or before the conspiracy reached a point where prevention of the object's accomplishment became impossible. By providing these detailed instructions to the jury, the Nebraska court aims to ensure a fair trial where the defense of withdrawal from conspiracy is appropriately considered and understood.