Choosing the best authorized record web template might be a battle. Naturally, there are a variety of themes available on the Internet, but how do you discover the authorized kind you need? Make use of the US Legal Forms site. The services gives a huge number of themes, like the Maryland Uncorroborated Testimony of Accomplice, which you can use for business and personal demands. Every one of the types are checked by specialists and satisfy state and federal requirements.
Should you be presently listed, log in to the accounts and click the Down load option to have the Maryland Uncorroborated Testimony of Accomplice. Make use of your accounts to appear with the authorized types you might have purchased earlier. Proceed to the My Forms tab of your accounts and obtain one more copy of your record you need.
Should you be a whole new consumer of US Legal Forms, allow me to share simple guidelines for you to adhere to:
US Legal Forms will be the biggest local library of authorized types that you can find different record themes. Make use of the company to download expertly-manufactured documents that adhere to express requirements.
Categories of Accomplice: Principal offender of First Degree and Second Degree: The principal offender of first degree is a person who actually commits the crime. The principal offender of the second degree is a person who either abets or aids the commission of the crime.
The court may presume that an accomplice is unworthy of any credit unless corroborated in material particulars, as per Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act.
"A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice, unless he be corroborated by such other evidence as tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime."
Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act says that an accomplice shall be a competent witness as against the accused person and a conviction the accused based on the testimony of an accomplice is valid even though it is not corroborated in material particulars.
The term Accomplice first appears in section 114 illustration (b) under the Indian Evidence Act 1872 which says that An accomplice is unworthy of credit unless he is corroborated in material particulars and subsequently again in section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 it defines Accomplice shall be a competent ...
For instance, in a bank robbery, the principal enters the bank and conducts the holdup, while an accomplice drives the getaway car, and an accessory helps the robber avoid arrest after the crime is complete.
To prevent the accomplice from shifting blame for their own actions and from providing false testimony to minimize their own wrongful conduct, California Penal Code § 1111 was enacted to require that testimony from an accomplice must be corroborated in order to be admissible at trial.
Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act says that an accomplice shall be a competent witness as against the accused person and a conviction the accused based on the testimony of an accomplice is valid even though it is not corroborated in material particulars.