US Legal Forms - among the greatest libraries of legitimate kinds in the United States - delivers a wide array of legitimate document web templates you can acquire or produce. Making use of the site, you can find thousands of kinds for organization and personal functions, categorized by classes, suggests, or keywords.You will discover the most up-to-date variations of kinds like the Colorado Jury Instruction - False Impersonation Of An Officer Of The United States in seconds.
If you already have a registration, log in and acquire Colorado Jury Instruction - False Impersonation Of An Officer Of The United States from the US Legal Forms library. The Down load button will show up on each type you see. You have accessibility to all formerly delivered electronically kinds within the My Forms tab of your respective account.
If you want to use US Legal Forms the first time, allow me to share simple recommendations to help you get started:
Each template you included with your money does not have an expiration day and is the one you have forever. So, in order to acquire or produce another duplicate, just check out the My Forms section and click on about the type you will need.
Obtain access to the Colorado Jury Instruction - False Impersonation Of An Officer Of The United States with US Legal Forms, by far the most extensive library of legitimate document web templates. Use thousands of specialist and state-certain web templates that meet up with your business or personal demands and specifications.
Before the recent update, the applicable jury instruction in Colorado defined reasonable doubt: ?Reasonable doubt means a doubt based upon reason and common sense which arises from a fair and rational consideration of all of the evidence, or the lack of evidence, in the case.
Judge's Instructions on the Law This is the judge's instruction to the jury. You have to apply that law to the facts, as you have heard them, in arriving at your verdict. You must consider all of the instructions and give them equal consideration.
In a criminal case, the prosecution bears the burden of proving that the defendant is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. This means that the prosecution must convince the jury that there is no other reasonable explanation that can come from the evidence presented at trial.
Reasonable doubt exists when you are not firmly convinced of the Defendant's guilt, after you have weighed and considered all the evidence. A Defendant must not be convicted on suspicion or speculation. It is not enough for the State to show that the Defendant is probably guilty.
The instruction tells jurors that if they're ?firmly convinced? of the defendant's guilt, the crime has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, but if they think there's a ?real possibility? the defendant isn't guilty, the prosecution didn't prove the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
It is not required that the government prove guilt beyond all possible doubt. A reasonable doubt is a doubt based upon reason and common sense and is not based purely on speculation. It may arise from a careful and impartial consideration of all the evidence, or from lack of evidence.