Colorado Jury Instruction - False Claims Against The Government
Description
How to fill out Jury Instruction - False Claims Against The Government?
You can spend several hours on the Internet attempting to find the legal document template which fits the state and federal specifications you need. US Legal Forms provides a huge number of legal forms which can be evaluated by experts. You can easily acquire or produce the Colorado Jury Instruction - False Claims Against The Government from my support.
If you have a US Legal Forms accounts, you may log in and then click the Acquire button. Next, you may total, change, produce, or indication the Colorado Jury Instruction - False Claims Against The Government. Each and every legal document template you purchase is your own forever. To obtain one more duplicate associated with a bought develop, check out the My Forms tab and then click the related button.
If you are using the US Legal Forms site the first time, follow the basic directions under:
- Initially, be sure that you have chosen the correct document template for that region/town of your choice. Browse the develop description to ensure you have picked out the right develop. If accessible, make use of the Preview button to appear through the document template at the same time.
- In order to find one more model of the develop, make use of the Lookup area to obtain the template that suits you and specifications.
- When you have located the template you need, click Buy now to proceed.
- Pick the prices prepare you need, type in your references, and sign up for a merchant account on US Legal Forms.
- Comprehensive the deal. You can use your credit card or PayPal accounts to fund the legal develop.
- Pick the format of the document and acquire it in your device.
- Make alterations in your document if needed. You can total, change and indication and produce Colorado Jury Instruction - False Claims Against The Government.
Acquire and produce a huge number of document layouts using the US Legal Forms web site, which provides the biggest variety of legal forms. Use professional and state-particular layouts to tackle your organization or specific needs.
Form popularity
FAQ
Punitive damages are legal recompense that a defendant found guilty of committing a wrong or offense is ordered to pay on top of compensatory damages. They are awarded by a court of law not to compensate injured plaintiffs but to punish defendants whose conduct is considered grossly negligent or intentional.
You may award punitive damages only if you find that the defendant's conduct that harmed the plaintiff was malicious, oppressive or in reckless disregard of the plaintiff's rights. Conduct is malicious if it is accompanied by ill will, or spite, or if it is for the purpose of injuring the plaintiff.
Punitive damages are not designed to compensate the plaintiff, but to deter others from engaging in similar wrongful behavior. While the plaintiff will receive the monetary award, the primary purpose of punitive damages is to punish the defendant.
The court may instruct the jury before or after the arguments are completed, or at both times.
The instruction tells jurors that if they're ?firmly convinced? of the defendant's guilt, the crime has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, but if they think there's a ?real possibility? the defendant isn't guilty, the prosecution didn't prove the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
To support a claim for punitive damages, the plaintiff must show that the conduct of the defendant was harsh, vindictive, reprehensible or malicious, which are adjectives adopted by McIntyre J., writing for the majority in Vorvis v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 1989 CanLII 93 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R.
The degree of injury sustained by the victim is of little consequence in the assessment of punitive damages. The award arises from intentional conduct which disregards the legal rights of the plaintiff in a malicious or outrageous manner.
?Preponderance of the evidence? means evidence that has more convincing force than that opposed to it. If the evidence is so evenly balanced that you are unable to say that the evidence on either side of an issue preponderates, your finding on that issue must be against the party who had the burden of proving it.