• US Legal Forms

Deceptive Practices In Research In Pima

State:
Multi-State
County:
Pima
Control #:
US-000289
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The document is a legal complaint addressing deceptive practices in research related to life insurance policies in Pima. It outlines allegations against defendants for fraudulent misrepresentation, concealment of material facts, and breach of contract concerning an insurance policy. Key features include identifying the plaintiff and defendants, detailing the complaint's basis on deceptive sales tactics, and listing specific instances of fraudulent behavior that misled the plaintiff. Filling out the form requires accurate input of names, dates, and amounts pertinent to the insurance policy. It targets various audiences—attorneys, partners, owners, associates, paralegals, and legal assistants—by providing a framework to initiate legal action against entities engaging in deceptive practices. This form assists users in filing complaints regarding false representations in insurance policies, ensuring proper legal recourse for affected individuals. Users should be meticulous in providing supporting documentation, such as evidence of the policy and any communication with the defendants, to strengthen the case.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand

Form popularity

FAQ

The study must not involve more than minimal risk to the subjects. The use of deceptive methods must be justified by the study's significant prospective scientific, educational, or applied value.

The debriefing is an essential part of the informed consent process and is mandatory when the research study involves use of deception. The debriefing provides participants with a full explanation of the hypothesis being tested, procedures to deceive participants and the reason(s) why it was necessary to deceive them.

The first step in managing deception with clients is recognizing that deception has occurred. The second step is determining what form the deception has taken (blatant, deflecting, diminishing, falsification or concealment). Third, the counselor must decide if the deception must be confronted.

A few ways deception might be used is by misrepresenting the purpose of the research, using participants, and observing participants without their knowledge. ing to the APA's guidelines, special precautions must be taken when using deception.

For a benign deception, most participants likely won't be upset, but more intense deception activities may require an in-depth debriefing process. After the participants are fully debriefed, you are required to provide a post-debrief consent form which asks for participants to again consent to participate in the study.

Examples of Active Deceptive Research Participants complete a quiz and are falsely told that they did poorly, regardless of their performance. Participants who do not know they are in a research study are observed to see how they behave when they find valuables (e.g., wallet, laptop) unattended in a public location.

For a benign deception, most participants likely won't be upset, but more intense deception activities may require an in-depth debriefing process. After the participants are fully debriefed, you are required to provide a post-debrief consent form which asks for participants to again consent to participate in the study.

(a) Psychologists do not conduct a study involving deception unless they have determined that the use of deceptive techniques is justified by the study's significant prospective scientific, educational, or applied value and that effective nondeceptive alternative procedures are not feasible.

If you have questions about submitting an allegation, you may contact the Allegations of Regulatory Misconduct Staff by phone at (240)402-7675 or by email at CDRHDeviceAllegations@fda.hhs.

After a complaint is filed, it is reviewed by an attorney general representative who determines whether: The complaint is appropriate for mediation by the office. If it should be referred to another governmental entity that may be more suited to assist with the consumer's complaint.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Deceptive Practices In Research In Pima