A motion in liming is a legal tool used by plaintiffs in West Virginia to prohibit the introduction of specific evidence related to the issue of performance, productivity, and/or efficiency during a trial. This motion aims to exclude any evidence that may be irrelevant, prejudicial, or misleading, and could potentially hinder the fair outcome of the case. In West Virginia, there are a few different types of plaintiff's motions in liming that can be filed in order to prohibit evidence on the issue of performance, productivity, and/or efficiency. These types include: 1. General Motion in Liming: This type of motion seeks a broad prohibition of all evidence related to performance, productivity, and/or efficiency that the plaintiff believes is irrelevant, unreliable, or unfairly prejudicial. The plaintiff's argument may center around the fact that such evidence does not directly pertain to the central claims or defenses of the case. 2. Specific Evidence Exclusion Motion: This motion is more focused and requests the exclusion of specific items of evidence or testimony that may be presented by the defense related to the issue of performance, productivity, and/or efficiency. The plaintiff needs to provide compelling arguments as to why these specific pieces of evidence should be prohibited, such as lack of relevance or potential for confusion. 3. Expert Testimony Prohibition Motion: Plaintiffs may also file a motion to prohibit the defendant from presenting expert testimony on the issue of performance, productivity, and/or efficiency. The plaintiff might argue that the expert testimony lacks scientific validity, the expert is not qualified in the relevant field, or that the testimony itself is irrelevant. When crafting a West Virginia plaintiff's motion in liming to prohibit evidence on the issue of performance, productivity, and/or efficiency, it is important to include relevant keywords to ensure it is properly categorized and understood by the court. Keywords that could be used may include: motion in liming, plaintiff, evidence, performance, productivity, efficiency, irrelevance, unfair prejudice, exclusion, testimony, expert, and West Virginia. In summary, a West Virginia plaintiff's motion in liming to prohibit evidence on the issue of performance, productivity, and/or efficiency is a legal document filed by the plaintiff to exclude specific evidence, testimony, or expert opinions that could be deemed irrelevant, unreliable, or unfairly prejudicial to the case. Proper utilization of relevant keywords can help ensure the motion is accurately classified and comprehended by the court.