Res IPSA Sequitur in Addition to Specified Acts of Negligence is a legal principle which allows for a plaintiff to prove a defendant’s liability without having to prove the defendant’s negligence directly. This is especially helpful in cases where the plaintiff cannot prove the defendant’s direct negligence, but where the circumstances indicate that negligence occurred. In other words, res IPSA sequitur in addition to specified acts of negligence allows a plaintiff to infer that the defendant was negligent without having to prove it directly. There are two types of Res IPSA Sequitur in Addition to Specified Acts of Negligence: 1) Res IPSA Sequitur with Specified Acts of Negligence and 2) Res IPSA Sequitur without Specified Acts of Negligence. In Res IPSA Sequitur with Specified Acts of Negligence, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant was negligent and must identify the specific negligent acts that occurred. The plaintiff must also show that the defendant had control over the circumstances that led to the injury. In Res IPSA Sequitur without Specified Acts of Negligence, the plaintiff does not have to prove that the defendant was negligent or identify the specific negligent acts that occurred. The plaintiff must still show that the defendant had control over the circumstances that led to the injury. This type of res IPSA sequitur is typically used when the plaintiff cannot identify the negligent conduct of the defendant.