A motion to quash asks the judge for an order setting aside or nullifying an action, such as "quashing" service of a summons.
This form is a generic example that may be referred to when preparing such a form for your particular state. It is for illustrative purposes only. Local laws should be consulted to determine any specific requirements for such a form in a particular jurisdiction.
Choosing the right lawful document format could be a have a problem. Obviously, there are a variety of themes available online, but how do you find the lawful form you need? Utilize the US Legal Forms web site. The support offers thousands of themes, like the South Carolina Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive, which you can use for organization and private demands. All of the types are checked out by specialists and meet state and federal demands.
In case you are currently listed, log in to the profile and click the Download key to find the South Carolina Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive. Make use of profile to appear from the lawful types you have acquired in the past. Go to the My Forms tab of your profile and acquire another backup from the document you need.
In case you are a fresh end user of US Legal Forms, listed below are straightforward instructions so that you can stick to:
US Legal Forms is the greatest library of lawful types in which you can find various document themes. Utilize the service to download appropriately-manufactured papers that stick to state demands.
If served with a subpoena duces tecum to produce documents or materials at a deposition, a witness may file a written objection to the inspection or copying of such documents. If an objection is made, the party issuing the subpoena may not inspect or copy the materials except upon a court order.
Common grounds for objecting to a third-party subpoena for documents include: Improper service. Improper issuance. Vague, ambiguous, and unreasonable requests.
Undue Burden. Subpoena recipients often object on the ground that compliance with the subpoena is unduly burdensome and expensive. Rule 45(d)(1) requires parties issuing a subpoena to ?take reasonable steps to avoid imposing an undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena.? Fed.
Objections: The other party or witness has the right to object to the subpoena. If the other party objects to the subpoena, and you are not able to reach a written agreement to change the language of the subpoena, he or she must file a request for order to quash the subpoena.
Rule 45(c)(3) provides a non-party, subpoenaed to appear at trial more than fifty miles from the place of service, the opportunity to move to quash the subpoena unless a special showing of need is made and reasonable compensation is provided to the witness.
Common grounds for filing a motion to quash are that the individual is outside the subpoena range, or that the items to be produced are unavailable within the specified time or at the specified location. Other common grounds for filing a motion to quash include undue burden and expense.
A court might, upon a proper motion, quash a subpoena duces tecum if the agency did not have the power to issue the subpoena, the materials sought are not relevant to an authorized investigation, and the items sought are not described with particularity and definiteness, as required by the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. ...
Any person to whom a subpoena is directed, or any party, may file a motion to quash or limit the subpoena. The motion must be filed with the judge, and it must include the reasons why compliance with the subpoena should not be required or the reasons why the subpoena's scope should be limited.
