Kansas Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use is a legal filing that aims to exclude any mention or evidence related to the non-use of seat belts in a personal injury case. It prevents the opposing party from referencing seat belt usage, arguing that it may unfairly sway the jury or be used as a basis for contributory negligence. Seat belts are an essential safety feature in vehicles, known to reduce the severity of injuries in accidents. However, in some situations, the defense may attempt to introduce evidence showing that the injured party did not wear a seat belt at the time of the accident. This evidence could potentially weaken the plaintiff's case or shift some liability onto the injured party. By filing a Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use, the plaintiff seeks to exclude any evidence or discussion about the non-use of seat belts for various reasons. It can be argued that such evidence is irrelevant, prejudicial, or might confuse the jury, compromising the fairness and accuracy of the legal proceedings. There are different types of Kansas Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use, including: 1. General Motion: This seeks a blanket ban on any reference to seat belt non-use throughout the trial, regardless of specific circumstances or arguments brought up by the defense. 2. Case-Specific Motion: In some cases, the motion may focus on specific facts related to the accident or the injured party's condition, aiming to exclude only certain evidence related to seat belt non-use that is deemed irrelevant, misleading, or prejudicial. 3. Comparative Negligence Motion: If the defense intends to argue that the plaintiff's injuries could have been less severe or avoided altogether if they had used a seat belt, this type of motion seeks to prevent such arguments from being made. It aims to establish that seat belt non-use cannot be used to attribute any fault to the injured party. 4. Prejudicial Effect Motion: This type of motion focuses on the potential bias that discussions about seat belt non-use may create, arguing that such evidence may unfairly influence the jury's decision and prejudice them against the plaintiff. In conclusion, a Kansas Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use is a legal strategy used by plaintiffs in personal injury cases to exclude any evidence, discussions, or arguments related to the non-use of seat belts. It protects the injured party from potential negative implications and ensures that the trial remains fair and impartial.