Are you presently within a position that requires you to have documents for either organizational or personal purposes almost all the time.
There are numerous legitimate document templates accessible online, but finding reliable ones can be challenging.
US Legal Forms offers thousands of form templates, such as the Indiana Motion for Disclosure of Any Possible Basis of Judicial Recusal, which are designed to comply with state and federal regulations.
Utilize US Legal Forms, the most extensive collection of legal forms, to save time and avoid errors.
The service provides professionally crafted legal document templates that can be used for various purposes. Create an account on US Legal Forms and start simplifying your life.
A federal statute provides that any federal justice, judge, or magistrate shall recuse ?in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be ques- tioned,? 28 U.S.C. §455(a), as well as in specific, enumerated circumstances.
Rule 2.9 - Ex Parte Communications (A) A judge shall not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications, or consider other communications made to the judge outside the presence of the parties or their lawyers, concerning a pending* or impending matter,* except as follows: (1) When circumstances require it, ex ...
The rule of necessity is a judicial doctrine that permits a judge or agency decision maker to decide a case even if he or she would ordinarily be disqualified due to bias or prejudice .
[1] Under this Rule, a judge is disqualified whenever the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned, regardless of whether any of the specific provisions of paragraphs (A)(1) through (6) apply. In many jurisdictions, the term "recusal" is used interchangeably with the term "disqualification."
The judge is only required to order recusal (or refer the matter over to another judge to decide whether recusal is necessary) if a reasonable person, knowing all the facts, would have doubts about the judge's ability to be impartial in the case. See State v.
There is, however, an exception to the ordinary recusal requirements, known as ?the rule of necessity,? which allows judges to hear a case in which virtually all other available judges would have the same disqualifying interest, and the case could not otherwise be heard.
Rule 2.17 of the Code of Judicial Conduct requires judges to prohibit the broadcast of court proceedings except under a narrow set of exceptions.
455(a). There is, however, an exception to the ordinary recusal requirements, known as ?the rule of necessity,? which allows judges to hear a case in which virtually all other available judges would have the same disqualifying interest, and the case could not otherwise be heard.