In a deed, a grantee may agree to do something or refrain from doing certain acts. This agreement will become a binding contract between the grantor and the grantee. An example would be an agreement to maintain fences on the property or that the property will only be used for residential purposes. This kind of covenant is binding, not only between the grantor and the grantee, but also runs with the land. This means that anyone acquiring the land from the grantee is also bound by the covenant of the grantee. A covenant that provides that the grantee will refrain from certain conduct is called a restrictive or protective covenant. For example, there may be a covenant that no mobile home shall be placed on the property.
A restrictive or protective covenant may limit the kind of structure that can be placed on the property and may also restrict the use that can be made of the land. For example, when a tract of land is developed for individual lots and homes to be built, it is common to use the same restrictive covenants in all of the deeds in order to cause uniform restrictions and patterns on the property. For example, the developer may provide that no home may be built under a certain number of square feet. Any person acquiring a lot within the tract will be bound by the restrictions if they are placed in the deed or a prior recorded deed. Also, these restrictive covenants may be placed in a document at the outset of the development entitled "Restrictive Covenants," and list all the restrictive covenants that will apply to the tracts of land being developed. Any subsequent deed can then refer back to the book and page number where these restrictive covenants are recorded. Any person owning one of the lots in the tract may bring suit against another lot owner to enforce the restrictive covenants. However, restrictive covenants may be abandoned or not enforceable by estoppel if the restrictive covenants are violated openly for a sufficient period of time in order for a Court to declare that the restriction has been abandoned.
The following form shows one way in which Restrictive or Protective Covenants may be amended.
A Protective Covenant With David In King
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
King
Control #:
US-00405BG
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
Answer and Explanation: No. ing to the Biblical narrative, people who touched the ark would be struck dead, like Uzzah who had sinful hands. King David brought the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem to celebrate God's presence with his people.
God gives infinitely more than He ever plans to receive. We see this clearly in God's covenant with David (2 Samuel 7). God had been blessing David since childhood, but here, He makes it official. God promises David these things: fame and prestige, deep roots, safety and security, legacy, and a bright future.
Ing to the Second Book of Samuel, the Levite Uzzah touched the Ark with his hand in order to steady it, and God instantly killed him.
God did not specify any conditions in the Davidic Covenant when He established it; thus, it is unconditional in nature, totally dependent on the faithfulness of God for the fulfillment of its promises. The genealogies in Matthew 1 and Luke 3 indicated that Jesus Christ is a physical descendant of David.
The last time the Ark of the Covenant was supposedly seen was in Jerusalem, some 2,600 years ago. Now archaeologists are exploring the ancient town of Kiriath Jearim, where the Bible says the ark was kept for 20 years before being taken to Jerusalem.
Unlike the Noahic covenant, there was no specific sign given in the case of the Lord's covenant with David. In 2 Samuel 7, it was simply a case of promise (covenant) given and promise (covenant) accepted.
When they came to the threshing floor of Nacon, Uzzah reached out and took hold of the ark of God, because the oxen stumbled. The LORD's anger burned against Uzzah because of his irreverent act; therefore God struck him down and he died there beside the ark of God.
Firstly David was betrayed by his close friend and counsellor, Ahithophel. That alone would have been bad enough... but unfortunately it came in the context of the much larger, wider betrayal of David's own son, Absalom. Absalom wanted the throne. He wanted his father, David, gone.
David KNEW that God would protect him. He trusted that God would be a “protective shield.” David knew that when he called out to God, God would answer Him. Hiding from Saul in caves would probably have been a scary time, but David trusted in God even though he was in danger. David knew that God was with him.
The term Magen David, which in Jewish liturgy signifies God as the protector (shield) of David, gained currency among medieval Jewish mystics, who attached magical powers to King David's shield just as earlier (non-Jewish) magical traditions had referred to the five-pointed star as the “seal of Solomon.” Kabbalists ...