Title: Understanding Wyoming Motion to Sequester Jurors Prior to and During the Trial Introduction: When a case goes to trial in Wyoming, parties involved may file a motion to sequester jurors prior to and during the trial. This legal procedure aims to ensure an impartial jury by preventing external influences or bias that may affect the fairness of the trial. This article aims to provide a detailed description of the Wyoming motion to sequester jurors, its significance, and the potential types of sequestration available in such cases. Keywords: Wyoming, motion to sequester jurors, prior to trial, during trial, impartial jury, legal procedure, external influences, bias, fairness, types of sequestration. 1. The Significance of Sequestering Jurors: Sequestering jurors in Wyoming trials is crucial to uphold the principles of fairness and impartiality. By isolating jurors during the trial, the court aims to prevent any external influence, discussions, or exposure to media coverage that could potentially influence their decision-making. 2. Wyoming Motion to Sequester Jurors Prior to Trial: a. Pretrial Juror Sequestration: This type of sequestration ensures that potential jurors do not discuss the case or receive any external information before the trial begins. It helps maintain the integrity of the jury selection process and prevents early exposure to biased opinions or media coverage. b. Void Dire Sequestration: During void dire, the process of questioning and selecting potential jurors, sequestration can be requested to avoid preconceived biases or outside influence during this critical part of the trial. 3. Wyoming Motion to Sequester Jurors During the Trial: a. Complete Sequestration: Also known as "Total Isolation," this form of juror sequestration entails keeping jurors entirely isolated from external contact throughout the trial. This aims to prevent any potential influence or communication that could taint their decision-making. b. Partial Sequestration: In some cases, partial sequestration may be employed, allowing jurors limited access to controlled media and restricted communication. This balanced approach seeks to balance jurors' need for information with the desire to maintain an impartial trial. c. Overnight Sequestration: When a trial extends over multiple days, jurors may be sequestered overnight to avoid outside influence between trial days. This ensures that jurors remain focused on the case's evidence and prevent any external biases from arising inadvertently. d. Sequestration with Limited Exceptions: This type of sequestration allows for some limited exceptions, such as medical appointments or emergencies, under strict supervision and prior court approval. Conclusion: In Wyoming, the motion to sequester jurors prior to and during a trial plays a crucial role in maintaining fairness, impartiality, and the integrity of the judicial process. By isolating jurors from external influences and potential biases, the court can strive to uphold the constitutional right to a fair trial. The different types of sequestration available, such as pretrial, void dire, complete or partial sequestration, overnight sequestration, and sequestration with limited exceptions, offer varying degrees of isolation, allowing the court to tailor the method to the unique circumstances of each case.