West Virginia Motion for Acquittal Based on Insanity: A West Virginia motion for acquittal based on insanity is a legal defense strategy utilized in criminal cases in the state of West Virginia. This motion aims to establish that the accused individual is not guilty by reason of insanity. It argues that at the time of committing the alleged offense, the defendant was not mentally capable of understanding the nature and consequences of their actions. Keywords: West Virginia, motion for acquittal, insanity defense, legal defense, criminal cases, not guilty by reason of insanity, mental capability, understanding, nature, consequences, alleged offense. Different Types of West Virginia Motion for Acquittal Based on Insanity: 1. M'Heighten Rule: In West Virginia, one type of insanity defense commonly used in a motion for acquittal is based on the M'Heighten Rule. This rule dictates that a defendant can be acquitted if they can prove that they suffered from a mental disorder at the time of the offense, and as a result, they did not understand the nature and wrongfulness of their actions. 2. Durham Rule: Another type of insanity defense recognized in West Virginia is based on the Durham Rule. This rule asserts that a defendant can be acquitted if they can demonstrate that their criminal behavior was a direct result of a mental defect or illness. 3. Irresistible Impulse Test: West Virginia also allows the use of the irresistible impulse test in a motion for acquittal based on insanity. This test implies that a defendant lacked the capacity to control their actions due to a diagnosed mental disorder, which resulted in the commission of the crime. 4. Substantial Capacity Test: The substantial capacity test is another type of insanity defense available in West Virginia. It requires the defendant to prove that due to a mental illness or defect, they lacked the substantial capacity to either appreciate the wrongfulness of their actions or conform their behavior to the requirements of the law. Keywords: M'Heighten Rule, Durham Rule, irresistible impulse test, mental disorder, mental defect, diagnosed mental illness, substantial capacity test, appreciate wrongfulness, conform behavior, legal requirements, mental capability.