Oklahoma Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Inconsistent Statement and Felony Conviction — Defendant Testifies With No Felony Conviction In criminal trials, Oklahoma Jury Instruction pertaining to impeachment is an important aspect that focuses on a specific situation where a defendant has made an inconsistent statement and possesses a felony conviction. However, there is a unique scenario where the defendant testifies but does not possess any felony conviction. Impeachment is a process used in courtrooms to challenge the credibility of a witness, including the defendant. If a defendant in an Oklahoma trial has previously been convicted of a felony, it can be used to question their credibility and potentially impact the jury's perception of the defendant's truthfulness. In such cases, the jury is instructed to consider the prior felony conviction when evaluating the defendant's testimony. However, there is a crucial distinction when it comes to the defendant testifying without any felony conviction. This scenario acknowledges that the defendant does not possess any prior felony conviction and functions as an exception to the general rule of impeachment. Here, the instruction serves to inform the jury that they should not consider the lack of a prior felony conviction as evidence of the defendant's credibility or truthfulness. It is important to note that the specific name of the Oklahoma Jury Instructions related to this scenario is not provided. Nonetheless, it is essential for both the prosecution and defense to be well-versed in this concept to ensure a fair trial. In summary, the Oklahoma Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Inconsistent Statement and Felony Conviction — Defendant Testifies With No Felony Conviction is a legal guideline that ensures the jury does not use the lack of a prior felony conviction as evidence to question the defendant's credibility. It acknowledges a unique case where the defendant provides testimony despite not having any felony convictions on record. This instruction emphasizes that the absence of a felony conviction should not affect the assessment of the defendant's truthfulness or reliability.