If you want to comprehensive, download, or print authorized record templates, use US Legal Forms, the greatest assortment of authorized kinds, that can be found online. Utilize the site`s basic and convenient look for to obtain the documents you need. Numerous templates for organization and personal purposes are sorted by categories and claims, or key phrases. Use US Legal Forms to obtain the Massachusetts Motion to Bar Prejudicial and Inaccurate Speculation Concerning Defendant's Possible Eligibility for Parole in just a handful of mouse clicks.
If you are previously a US Legal Forms client, log in for your profile and click the Download key to obtain the Massachusetts Motion to Bar Prejudicial and Inaccurate Speculation Concerning Defendant's Possible Eligibility for Parole. You can even access kinds you previously acquired in the My Forms tab of your own profile.
If you are using US Legal Forms the very first time, refer to the instructions under:
Each and every authorized record web template you purchase is your own forever. You possess acces to every single develop you acquired in your acccount. Select the My Forms segment and decide on a develop to print or download once more.
Be competitive and download, and print the Massachusetts Motion to Bar Prejudicial and Inaccurate Speculation Concerning Defendant's Possible Eligibility for Parole with US Legal Forms. There are thousands of skilled and status-particular kinds you can use for the organization or personal demands.
Evidence that a third party committed the crimes charged against the defendant, or had the motive, intent, and opportunity to commit the crimes, is admissible provided that the evidence has substantial probative value.
"The best evidence rule provides that, where the contents of a document are to be proved, the party must either produce the original or show a sufficient excuse for its nonproduction.
Third party evidence is evidence which is obtained from someone other that the accused or the complainant. It is vital that we, as defence solicitors, obtain as much third party evidence in favour of the defendant as possible.
Evid. 702, reflects Massachusetts common law. The proponent of expert testimony must establish the foundational requirements for admissibility, and the judge, as the ?gatekeeper? of the evidence, must make a threshold determination that those requirements have been met before the testimony goes to the jury.
224, 230 (1992); Section 403, Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons (relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice, confusion, etc.).