Generally speaking, the writ of error coram nobis is employed, in cases where there is no other remedy, for the purpose of reviewing, correcting, or vacating a judgment in the same court in which it was rendered, on account of errors of fact. These errors of fact must affect the validity and regularity of the proceedings, and were not put in issue at the trial, or were unknown at the time of the trial to the party seeking relief without fault on his or her part. Also, the remedy may be available if such facts were unknown to the trial court, were not passed on by it, and, if known, would have prevented rendition of the judgment.
The writ of error coram nobis is not often granted in civil cases, but it is still available in some courts to correct an error of fact which resulted in the judgment. The coram nobis procedure has largely been replaced by motions to open or vacate the judgment or a writ of audita querela. A writ of audita querela is a writ which lies for a party against whom judgment is recovered, but to whom good matter of discharge has subsequently accrued which could not have been availed of to prevent such judgment.
The Connecticut Affidavit in Support of Motion for Writ of Error Coral Obis Regarding Default and Default Judgment Taken Against Defendant who did not Appear and was not Served is a legal document that can be used in cases where a default judgment has been entered against a defendant who was not properly served and did not have the opportunity to appear in court. This affidavit serves as a sworn statement, outlining the reasons why the default judgment should be set aside and a new trial should be granted. Keywords: Connecticut, Affidavit, Motion for Writ of Error Coral Obis, Default Judgment, Defendant, Did not Appear, Not Served, Legal Document, Default Judgment Taken Against, New Trial. Different types of Connecticut Affidavits in Support of Motion for Writ of Error Coral Obis Regarding Default and Default Judgment Taken Against Defendant who did not Appear and was not Served can include: 1. Affidavit of Lack of Proper Service: This type of affidavit is used when the defendant claims that they were not properly served with the initial lawsuit, and hence could not participate in the proceedings. 2. Affidavit of Excusable Neglect: This affidavit is used when the defendant acknowledges that they were properly served with the lawsuit but failed to respond due to circumstances beyond their control, such as illness, emergency, or misinformation. 3. Affidavit of Lack of Notice of Default Judgment: This affidavit is used when the defendant claims that they were not aware of the default judgment entered against them, and hence did not have the opportunity to challenge it. 4. Affidavit of Meritorious Defense: This affidavit is used when the defendant asserts that they have a valid defense against the claims made in the lawsuit and should, therefore, be given the opportunity to present their case in court. These different types of affidavits are tailored to address specific circumstances of the defendant's non-appearance and lack of proper service. They help support the defendant's motion for a Writ of Error Coral Obis, which seeks to correct a judgment based on errors of fact or law.
