This form is a Complaint for an Injunction and Other Relief. The plaintiff asked the court to issue an order enjoining the defendant from further violation of a covenant not to compete in the relevant area. The plaintiff also requests that damages be paid to him/her to compensate for the violation of the covenant.
Arkansas Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete
Category:
State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-CMP-10058
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
How to fill out Complaint For Injunction - Covenant Not To Compete?
You may devote time on the Internet searching for the lawful papers template that fits the federal and state demands you want. US Legal Forms offers thousands of lawful kinds that are analyzed by pros. It is possible to acquire or print out the Arkansas Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete from our service.
If you currently have a US Legal Forms account, you are able to log in and click the Acquire option. Next, you are able to full, change, print out, or indicator the Arkansas Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete. Every single lawful papers template you get is the one you have for a long time. To acquire one more duplicate associated with a obtained kind, check out the My Forms tab and click the corresponding option.
If you work with the US Legal Forms website for the first time, follow the easy instructions beneath:
- Initially, make certain you have chosen the proper papers template to the region/area that you pick. Look at the kind outline to make sure you have selected the proper kind. If readily available, make use of the Preview option to appear from the papers template too.
- If you want to discover one more model in the kind, make use of the Research discipline to get the template that fits your needs and demands.
- Once you have found the template you would like, click Purchase now to proceed.
- Select the costs plan you would like, enter your references, and sign up for your account on US Legal Forms.
- Full the transaction. You can use your charge card or PayPal account to purchase the lawful kind.
- Select the file format in the papers and acquire it in your gadget.
- Make adjustments in your papers if required. You may full, change and indicator and print out Arkansas Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete.
Acquire and print out thousands of papers layouts utilizing the US Legal Forms web site, that offers the greatest collection of lawful kinds. Use expert and condition-specific layouts to tackle your organization or specific demands.
Form popularity
FAQ
Although governed by individual state laws, common factors include whether the employer has a legitimate interest to protect; whether the geographic scope prevents the worker from making a living; the length of restriction; whether the agreement prevents workers from doing different work from what they are doing; and ...
The Arkansas courts have made it abundantly clear that restrictive non-compete agreements (or ?covenants?) are enforceable if the terms are reasonable and necessary to protect the employer's business interests.
It provides that a restrictive covenant is reasonable, and thus, enforceable, if: (1) its terms are no greater than is required to protect the employer's legitimate business interest; (2) it does not impose undue hardship on the former employee; and (3) it is not injurious to the public.
Covenants not to compete are frequently enforced where the former employer's "confidential information" may be used or disclosed unless the employee is restrained from competing.
Specificity: A non-compete agreement must be specific about the activities it prohibits. Additionally, the covenant must clearly articulate what activities are considered competing and those activities must be substantially similar or related to the work the employee performed for the employer.
A covenant not to compete has three elements: (1) a limitation on the work that may be pursued by the employee, (2) a definite time, and (3) a definite geographical area.
One of the most important factors courts will often look at when determining the validity of a non-compete agreement is whether it actually protects a legitimate business interest of the employer. If it doesn't, there really isn't any reason to stop the employee from competing against a former employer.
California law bars covenants not to compete in nearly all circumstances. In Edwards v. Arthur Anderson, the California Supreme Court determined that the law should be read strictly, and not only void the ?unreasonable? noncompete clause, but all noncompete clauses other than those explicitly allowed in the code.