The nine types of statements California has ruled to be defamatory per se include: Statements charging a plaintiff with a crime (or having been indicted, convicted, or punished for a crime). Statements that label a plaintiff, “communist.” Statements that a plaintiff has an infectious, contagious, or loathsome disease.
Truth, or substantial truth, is a complete defense to a claim of defamation.
In cases involving public figures or matters of public concern, the burden is on you to prove falsity. In cases involving matters of purely private concern, the burden of proving the truth is on the defendant. A defendant does not have to show the literal truth of every word in an alleged defamatory statement.
In California, a claim for defamation involves a false statement made by one person about another person, which causes harm to a person's property, business, profession or occupation.
The most common defenses to defamation are: 1) truth; 2) consent; 3) privilege; and 4) the statute of limitations. Perhaps the most distinct aspect of the defamation cause of action is that falsity is required. In other words, the statement publicized about the plaintiff must be false in order to prove defamation.
Defamation Per Se Under California Defamation Law In most California slander and libel cases, plaintiffs must prove how the communications under review caused material harm — except in per se lawsuits. A statement is considered defamatory per se if harm to the victim is inherent.
I am writing because you recently made defamatory statements about me my company my company and me. I ask that you immediately retract these statements. On date, you summarize what recipient did that is defamatory.
A defamatory statement must be an assertion of fact, not an opinion. For example, if your boss says that you are not a very nice person, then that statement is likely to be an opinion. On the other hand, if your boss says you have been stealing from the company, that is a statement of fact, not opinion.