Pleading For Insanity In Chicago
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
The Trial of John W. Hinckley, Jr. The verdict of "not guilty" for reason of insanity in the 1982 trial of John Hinckley, Jr. for his attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan stunned and outraged many Americans.
Legal insanity requires that the person, by reason of mental disease or defect was incapable of either: Knowing the nature of his or her act. Understanding the nature of his or her act. Distinguishing between right and wrong at the time of commission of the crime.
Ing to an eight-state study, the insanity defense is used in less than 1% of all court cases and, when used, has only a 26% success rate. Of those cases that were successful, 90% of the defendants had been previously diagnosed with mental illness.
Trial of John Hinckley Jr. On March 30, 1981, John Hinckley attempted to assassinate President Ronald Reagan. In 1982 the verdict declared him “not guilty” by reason of insanity. The trial's result sparked public outrage, as they thought the act was done to impress actress Jodie Foster.
In Illinois, the insanity defense comes from the principle that a person cannot be held criminally responsible if, due to a mental disease or defect, he lacks the capacity to appreciate the criminality of his conduct.
Most courts have held that diagnoses such as schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder qualify as a mental disease for the purpose of insanity. Diagnoses such as personality disorders, paraphilias, and voluntary substance intoxication do not usually qualify.
Insanity can be extremely difficult to prove. In fact, less than 1% of defendants in criminal cases plead insanity as their defense in the United States, and only about . 26% of those who plead insanity are successful in their plea, ing to the same source.
A Michael Abram. Adélio Bispo de Oliveira. Edward Charles Allaway. Marcelo Costa de Andrade. Iván Arancibia. Jeffrey Arenburg. Alexander Astashev.
Penal Code section 1026, et. Seq. Legal insanity requires that the person, by reason of mental disease or defect was incapable of either: Knowing the nature of his or her act. Understanding the nature of his or her act. Distinguishing between right and wrong at the time of commission of the crime.
Moreover, even when the defense is asserted, it is successful in only about 30 cases every year. Defendants found not guilty by reason of insanity are not simply released.
