If a party or attorney does not respond to a request for discovery, then the party requesting the discovery needs to file a Motion to Compel Discovery with the Court and set a Court Hearing for same.
If you filed a request for discovery and the other party will not answer or provide you with the information, you can file a Motion To Compel. This Motion asks the Court to force the other party to answer your requests. You can also ask the Court to sanction the other party for not answering your requests.
The Discovery Rule The discovery “tolls” (pauses) the statute of limitations. This means that the statute of limitations clock doesn't start counting down from two years to zero until the date that you actually discover your injury or should have discovered it.
In certain cases, you might be able to write a letter to the other side and request the documents that you need. However, in more formal cases, you will likely have to draft more formal discovery demands. There are usually forms available for this in local law libraries, from the court clerk's office, or online.
Parties usually send their discovery requests and responses to the other party electronically, by email. But, parties may also send or respond to discovery requests by U.S. mail or a parcel service. Discovery requests and responses should not be sent to the Administrative Judge, except to support a motion.
If a party or witness fails to adequately respond to a proper request for discovery, the party seeking discovery may file a motion with the ALJ for an order compelling a response in ance with the request. An evasive or incomplete response to discovery may be treated as a failure to respond.
Undeniably, if you ignore a request for information, the other party will either ask again or pursue a court order that forces you to provide evidence. This request, a motion to compel, requires submitting a formal request to a judge and asking them to intervene and request information.
The California discovery rule stops the clock on the statute of limitations until the plaintiff either finds out about the cause of action or has a good reason to do so. This rule comes into play when the plaintiff didn't realize, and a reasonable person wouldn't have realized, that they were harmed.
In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a person the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized to do so by law or a court order.