Wrongful Interference With Goods In Washington

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-000303
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The document presented is a civil complaint focusing on wrongful interference with goods in Washington, particularly concerning the legal right to possession of a deceased person's body for burial. The Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants, including a medical facility and its personnel, acted negligently and with willful disregard by failing to replace body parts after an autopsy, which prevented the Plaintiffs from conducting a complete burial. The complaint outlines numerous counts, including negligence, wrongful interference, and emotional distress, showcasing specific acts of negligence that led to severe physical and emotional harm to the Plaintiffs. This form serves as an essential tool for attorneys and legal professionals to navigate cases involving wrongful interference in burial rights, enabling them to articulate claims clearly and substantiate their legal arguments. Partners, owners, associates, paralegals, and legal assistants can utilize this form to build their cases effectively, ensuring adherence to procedural requirements while advocating for their clients' rights. The structure of the document allows for easy editing and filling, facilitating a straightforward process for legal practitioners unfamiliar with such cases.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For Wrongful Interference With Right To Possession For Burial
  • Preview Complaint For Wrongful Interference With Right To Possession For Burial
  • Preview Complaint For Wrongful Interference With Right To Possession For Burial
  • Preview Complaint For Wrongful Interference With Right To Possession For Burial
  • Preview Complaint For Wrongful Interference With Right To Possession For Burial

Form popularity

FAQ

Broadly speaking, interference in a legal setting is wrongful conduct that prevents or disturbs another in the performance of their usual activities, in the conduct of their business or contractual relations, or in the enjoyment of their full legal rights.

3 Form of judgment where goods are detained. (1)In proceedings for wrongful interference against a person who is in possession or in control of the goods relief may be given in ance with this section, so far as appropriate. (c)damages.

Definition of “wrongful interference with goods” (a) conversion of goods (also called trover); (b) trespass to goods; (c) negligence so far as it results in damage to goods or to an interest in goods; (d) subject to section 2, any other tort so far as it results in damage to goods or to an interest in goods.

Tortious interference is when a party outside of a contract or business relationship interferes with your economic advantage or business contracts in a 'wrongful' manner. The law provides recourse through a claim for tortious interference with contractual or economic advantage.

The Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 introduces a collective description ' wrongful interference with goods' to cover conversion, trespass to goods, negligence resulting in damage to goods or to an interest in goods and any other tort in so far as it results in damage to goods or an interest in goods.

The Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 introduces a collective description ' wrongful interference with goods' to cover conversion, trespass to goods, negligence resulting in damage to goods or to an interest in goods and any other tort in so far as it results in damage to goods or an interest in goods.

As an example, someone could use blackmail to induce a contractor into breaking a contract; they could threaten a supplier to prevent them from supplying goods or services to another party; or they could obstruct someone's ability to honor a contract with a client by deliberately refusing to deliver necessary goods.

Example: If a person causes harm to another person or their property due to their negligence or intentional actions, it can be considered tortious conduct. For instance, if a driver runs a red light and hits a pedestrian, causing them injuries, the driver can be held liable for their tortious conduct.

Wrongful interference with property embraces three general categories: (1) damage to the property; (2) interference with the owner's property rights; and (3) interference with the owner's possession of the property.

1 Definition of “wrongful interference with goods”. (a)conversion of goods (also called trover), (b)trespass to goods, (c)negligence so far at it results in damage to goods or to an interest in goods. (d)subject to section 2, any other tort so far as it results in damage to goods or to an interest in goods.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Wrongful Interference With Goods In Washington