• US Legal Forms

Use Of Deception In Research In Cook

State:
Multi-State
County:
Cook
Control #:
US-000289
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The document is a legal complaint filed in the United States District Court related to the use of deception in research in Cook. It outlines allegations against defendants regarding fraudulent misrepresentation and concealment concerning a life insurance policy. Key features of the form include sections for identifying the plaintiff and defendant, outlining the facts of the case, and detailing the specific deceptive practices involved, particularly around the 'vanishing premium' concept. Filling and editing instructions highlight the need to include relevant personal and corporate information and to attach any necessary supporting documents, like the insurance policy. This form is particularly useful for attorneys, partners, owners, associates, paralegals, and legal assistants involved in insurance litigation or consumer protection cases. The target audience can utilize this document to effectively articulate claims of fraud and negligence, ensuring that all pertinent details of the deception are clearly presented for judicial consideration.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand

Form popularity

FAQ

-Catching liars typically involves the three principles to detect deception: observing behaviors, listening to speech content, and noting any physiological responses.

Deception in psychological research is often stated as acceptable only when all of the following conditions are met: 1) no other nondeceptive method exists to study the phenomenon of interest; 2) the study makes significant contributions to scientific knowledge; 3) the deception is not expected to cause significant ...

Deception in psychological research is often stated as acceptable only when all of the following conditions are met: 1) no other nondeceptive method exists to study the phenomenon of interest; 2) the study makes significant contributions to scientific knowledge; 3) the deception is not expected to cause significant ...

Deception studies provide participants with an alternative explanation for the purpose of the study or provide them with misleading information about the study. Some studies may not directly deceive the participant but will withhold some information, such as the reason why a participant was selected for the study.

Deception should only be used when its use is the only way to answer the research question. Research plans that involve the use of deception must be adequately justified and, in most cases, will require that research participants be informed about the deception at the conclusion of their participation.

The IRB discourages the use of deception when: Alternative methods can be used that will yield valid study results. The deception deprives participants of the opportunity to protect their own interests. The missing information affects the participants' ability to assess the risks of participation.

They divide deceptions into three categories: cover, lying, and deception. Cover refers to secret keeping and camouflage. Lying is subdivided into simple lying and lying with artifice. Lying is more active than cover in that it draws the target away from the truth.

Three elements of deception: You believe what you're saying is true. If you don't intend for others to believe what you're saying (being sarcastic). You cannot lie to yourself.

Deception is when a researcher gives false information to subjects or intentionally misleads them about some key aspect of the research. Examples include: Subjects complete a quiz, and are falsely told that they did very poorly, regardless of their actual performance.

Psychologists do not conduct a study involving deception unless they have determined that the use of deceptive techniques is justified by the study's significant prospective scientific, educational or applied value and that effective nondeceptive alternative procedures are not feasible.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Use Of Deception In Research In Cook