• US Legal Forms

Deceptive Practices In Research In Clark

State:
Multi-State
County:
Clark
Control #:
US-000289
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The document outlines a legal complaint filed by a plaintiff against multiple defendants, alleging deceptive practices in research, specifically involving misleading information regarding a life insurance policy's premium structure. Central to the plaintiff's claims are allegations of fraud, misrepresentation, and concealment of material facts related to the policy's performance, particularly the 'vanishing premium' concept which was misrepresented to induce the plaintiff's purchase. The complaint details specific actions by the defendants that aimed to conceal adverse actuarial realities and the unsuitable nature of the dividend scale, impacting the policy’s sustainability. Key features of the complaint include the identification of the parties involved, the basis of the plaintiff's claims, and the specified damages sought, which include both actual and punitive damages. Filling instructions emphasize the necessity to customize the document with relevant names, dates, and details before filing. This form is particularly useful for attorneys, partners, owners, associates, paralegals, and legal assistants who encounter cases of insurance fraud and misrepresentation, providing a structured approach to asserting legal rights and seeking remedies for aggrieved clients.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand

Form popularity

FAQ

Investigators may mislead or omit information about the purpose of the research, the role of the researcher, or what procedures in the study are actually experimental. Deception increases ethical concerns because it interferes with the ability of the subject to give informed consent.

Examples of Active Deceptive Research Participants complete a quiz and are falsely told that they did poorly, regardless of their performance. Participants who do not know they are in a research study are observed to see how they behave when they find valuables (e.g., wallet, laptop) unattended in a public location.

Deception studies provide participants with an alternative explanation for the purpose of the study or provide them with misleading information about the study. Some studies may not directly deceive the participant but will withhold some information, such as the reason why a participant was selected for the study.

Deception in psychological research is often stated as acceptable only when all of the following conditions are met: 1) no other nondeceptive method exists to study the phenomenon of interest; 2) the study makes significant contributions to scientific knowledge; 3) the deception is not expected to cause significant ...

Deception is when a researcher gives false information to subjects or intentionally misleads them about some key aspect of the research. This could include feedback to subjects that involves creating false beliefs about oneself, one's relationship, or manipulation of one's self-concept.

Milgram's Obedience Study One example of deception in psychological research is a 1963 obedience study conducted by the American social psychologist Stanley Milgram. As a Yale University professor, Milgram did not inform participants of the true nature of his study.

Examples of Active Deceptive Research Participants complete a quiz and are falsely told that they did poorly, regardless of their performance. Participants who do not know they are in a research study are observed to see how they behave when they find valuables (e.g., wallet, laptop) unattended in a public location.

Some forms of deception include: Lies: making up information or giving information that is the opposite or very different from the truth. Equivocations: making an indirect, ambiguous, or contradictory statement.

A finding of Research Misconduct requires that the misconduct be committed intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly. A finding of Research Misconduct also requires that there be a significant departure from accepted practices of the relevant research community.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Deceptive Practices In Research In Clark