4th Amendment Us Constitution With Case Laws In Fulton

State:
Multi-State
County:
Fulton
Control #:
US-000280
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The document is a legal Complaint filed in a United States District Court addressing allegations of wrongful actions by a defendant against a plaintiff. Specifically, it highlights the plaintiff's claims of malicious prosecution and false arrest related to a prior incident of trespass that resulted in an unlawful arrest. The complaint references the 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, and discusses relevant case law from Fulton that underscores the importance of protecting individual rights in such situations. Notably, the plaintiff requests compensatory and punitive damages for mental anguish, attorney fees, and costs associated with the proceedings. This form is particularly useful for attorneys, partners, owners, associates, paralegals, and legal assistants in framing a solid case concerning false allegations, providing a structured format to outline claims and damages, facilitating easier understanding of complex legal principles for users with varying levels of legal experience, and ensuring compliance with legal requirements. Clear filling and editing instructions within the form guide users on how to appropriately complete and submit the document.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For False Arrest and Imprisonment - 4th and 14th Amendment, US Constitution - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For False Arrest and Imprisonment - 4th and 14th Amendment, US Constitution - Jury Trial Demand

Form popularity

FAQ

The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment, however, is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law.

Brendlin v. California | United States Courts.

Brendlin v. California | United States Courts.

In a juvenile court, T.L.O. argued that her Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures had been violated. The court sided with the school, and T.L.O. took her case to the New Jersey Supreme Court, which later found that the search was unreasonable and the evidence could not be used.

Decision: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 5-3 vote in favor of Mapp. The high court said evidence seized unlawfully, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.

The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment, however, is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law.

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement These include: Exigent circumstances. Plain view. Search incident to arrest.

Brendlin v. California | United States Courts.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

4th Amendment Us Constitution With Case Laws In Fulton