Motion To Strike With Prejudice In San Jose

State:
Multi-State
City:
San Jose
Control #:
US-00004BG-I
Format:
Word; 
PDF; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

This is a generic Affidavit to accompany a Motion to amend or strike alimony provisions of a divorce decree because of the obligor spouse's changed financial condition. This form is a generic example that may be referred to when preparing such a form for your particular state. It is for illustrative purposes only. Local laws should be consulted to determine any specific requirements for such a form in a particular jurisdiction.

Free preview
  • Preview Affidavit of Defendant Spouse in Support of Motion to Amend or Strike Alimony Provisions of Divorce Decree Because Of Obligor Spouse's Changed Financial Condition
  • Preview Affidavit of Defendant Spouse in Support of Motion to Amend or Strike Alimony Provisions of Divorce Decree Because Of Obligor Spouse's Changed Financial Condition

Form popularity

FAQ

If the two sides cannot reach an agreement, the defendant has to file and serve the demurrer or motion to strike within the deadline (usually 30 days) for responding to the Complaint. The other side then gets a chance to file a response before a court date where the judge will make a decision.

A case is dismissed with prejudice when the defect cannot be remedied because, for example, the claim has no basis in law, and it is permanently dismissed. (That does not mean that you can't bring an appeal to challenge the trial judge's decision.)

In general, an action taken with prejudice is final. For example, dismissal with prejudice forbids a party to refile the case and might occur because of misconduct on the part of the party that filed the claim or criminal complaint or as the result of an out-of-court agreement or settlement.

When a court dismisses an action, they can either do so “with prejudice” or “without prejudice.” Dismissal with prejudice means that the plaintiff cannot refile the same claim again in that court.

These include dismissals for: (b)(1) a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (b)(2) a lack of personal jurisdiction. (b)(3) improper venue.

An example would be if a judge determines a lawsuit as insignificant or the issue has been resolved. There are several reasons why a case can be dismissed with prejudice. In some cases, if the court finds the evidence presented does not support the claims, they may dismiss the case.

C.C.P. § 436 allows for a motion to strike “any irrelevant, false, or improper matter asserted in any pleading” or portion of a pleading “not drawn of filed in conformity with the laws of this state.” A motion to strike is proper “when a substantive defect is clear from the face of a complaint.” (PH II, Inc.

A motion to dismiss asks the court to dismiss either whole or part of a complaint, counterclaim, or crossclaim. Motion to strike or "Demurrer": In some jurisdictions, a motion to strike or a "demurrer" is the equivalent to a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

A. Any certified or duly recognized bargaining representative may declare a strike in cases of bargaining deadlock and unfair labor practice. Likewise, the employer may declare a lockout in the same cases.

More info

Step 1 Complete the following forms in blue or black ink: ☒ CIV-110 Request for Dismissal. ☒ CIV-120 Notice of Entry of Dismissal and Proof of Service.This HowTo Guide addresses the steps for filing and serving motions in general civil cases in Santa Clara Superior Court. A motion to strike is sort of like a scalpel to cut out inappropriate parts of a lawsuit. There might not be a proper basis for punitive damages. A motion to strike can be used to attack legal conclusions in a pleading. Any case for which all parties do not consent will be reassigned to a District Judge in the San Francisco, Oakland, or San Jose division. A motion asserting any of these defenses must be made before pleading if a responsive pleading is allowed. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendant's first, eighth, sixteenth and forty-first affirmative defense with prejudice. III. Wesley Klimczak, Office of the City Attorney, San Jose, CA, for Defendant Michael Roberson.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Motion To Strike With Prejudice In San Jose