Summary judgment. A superior court's ruling granting summary judgment is an order. A party seeking to appeal the ruling must first get a judgment based on that ruling. The facts are taken from the evidence before the trial court at the time of its ruling.
A summary judgment means the court believes there's no dispute worth resolving. However, this isn't always true. To avoid a summary judgment, it's essential to file a counter-motion with a supporting memorandum. If that step isn't taken, the judge may grant the motion.
A party may file an amended pleading after it files its summary judgment motion or response. A summary judgment proceeding is considered a “trial” with respect to filing amended pleadings ing to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 63, the rule for calculating pertinent time periods.
To Amend a Motion (to add or strike or substitute words or phrases) — debatable, requires majority vote. (A motion can be made to amend a proposed amendment.) The mover of the motion (or the committee chair if the motion comes from a committee) speaks first on a motion.
Limitations on Filing Motions New Rules (Effective January 1, 2025) and codified in CCP § 473c(a)(4): Parties are prohibited from filing more than one motion for summary judgment against an adverse party without leave of court.
A summary judgment means the court believes there's no dispute worth resolving. However, this isn't always true. To avoid a summary judgment, it's essential to file a counter-motion with a supporting memorandum. If that step isn't taken, the judge may grant the motion.
All exhibits should be submitted in a single volume if possible, with multiple volumes permitted only to the extent necessary to meet file size limitations in subdivision (b)(1) of this rule.
In a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. No reply or closing memorandum may exceed 10 pages.
Limits on Successive Summary Judgment Motions The new law codifies the rule that parties are limited to one summary judgment motion, unless they obtain a court order granting a subsequent motion upon a showing of good cause. While many courts already follow this practice, it is now explicitly part of the statute.