Wyoming Sample Questions, Voir Dire Examination
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
Lesson Summary. Challenge for cause is a practice that allows attorneys to remove prospective jurors who can't render a fair and impartial verdict. A juror's inability to hear a particular case may be based on a variety of factors, including close relationships with a party in the case, or actual and implied biases.
The attorneys may challenge some jurors and ask the Court to excuse them from the trial. There are two types of challenges; challenge for cause and peremptory challenge.
1. Is there anything, whether or not covered by the previous questions, which would affect your ability to be a fair and impartial juror or in any way be a problem for you in serving on this jury? 2. Is there anything else that you feel is important for the parties in this case to know about you?
Do you think there are too many, too few or about the right number of lawsuits? What is a ?frivolous lawsuit?? How can you determine what is a ?real? case and what is a ?frivolous? case? Do you think some people file ?frivolous lawsuits?? Why or why not?
Following the questioning of potential jurors, each side's attorney may use one of two sorts of challenges: "for cause" or "peremptory." When a counsel challenges a jury, the court is asked to remove that member from the panel.
The statute is explicit that the only purpose of voir dire is to aid in the exercise of challenges for cause, and interpretative case law emphasizes that voir dire is not properly used for indoctrinating pro- spective jurors on the lawyers' theories of the case, for questioning about the applicable law, or for ...
During voir dire the lawyers may ask the judge to excuse a juror from sitting on the case. This is called "challenging a juror". There are two types of challenges: a challenge for cause and a peremptory challenge.
When selecting a jury, both parties may remove potential jurors using an unlimited number of challenges for cause (e.g., stated reasons such as bias) and a limited number of peremptory challenges (i.e., do not need to state a reason).
