A Virgin Islands Motion to Sequester Jurors Prior to and During the Trial of this Case is a legal document filed by either the prosecution or the defense requesting the court to isolate the jurors from outside influences and prevent any potential bias or interference during the trial proceedings. This motion aims to ensure a fair and impartial trial by safeguarding the integrity of the jury and minimizing the risk of external influences influencing their decision-making process. There are various types of Virgin Islands Motions to Sequester Jurors Prior to and During the Trial of this Case, including: 1. Pre-trial sequestration motion: This motion requests the court to sequester the jurors from the beginning of the trial until its conclusion. It aims to prevent any potential exposure to media coverage, discussions, or any outside sources that may influence the jurors' objectivity. 2. Partial sequestration motion: This type of motion seeks to sequester the jurors during specific periods of the trial, such as when sensitive testimony or evidence is presented, in order to prevent any outside influence that might affect their judgment. 3. Continuous sequestration motion: This motion requests the court to sequester the jurors throughout the entire duration of the trial, including during breaks, evenings, and weekends. It ensures that the jurors remain isolated from external factors that could impact their decision-making process. 4. Alternating sequestration motion: This motion proposes a schedule where the jurors are sequestered on certain days or specific times, while being allowed to return to their homes or a designated location on other days or times. This type of sequestration may be considered when an extended trial period is expected or if the jurors reside in remote areas. When considering a Virgin Islands Motion to Sequester Jurors Prior to and During the Trial of this Case, the court examines the specifics of the case, such as its high-profile nature, potential media attention, the relevance of the witnesses' testimony, and the likelihood of juror bias. The decision to grant or deny the motion lies within the judge's discretion and is based on the need to ensure a fair and impartial trial.