A voluntary participant in a game, sport, or contest, assumes all risks incidental to the particular game, sport, or contest which are obvious and foreseeable. However, he or she does not assume an extraordinary risk which is not normally incident to the game or sport. Even where the assumption of the risk doctrine applies, defendants have a duty to use due care not to increase the risks to a participant over and above those inherent in the sport. While under the doctrine of assumption of risk, a defendant has no legal duty to eliminate or protect a plaintiff from the risks inherent in a sport, but the defendant owes a duty not to increase the inherent risks. To determine whether the primary assumption of risk doctrine applies to a sports participant, the court must decide whether the injury suffered arises from a risk inherent in the sport, and whether imposing a duty might fundamentally alter the nature of the sport.
The following form is a complaint that adopts the "notice pleadings" format of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which have been adopted by most states in one form or another.
Title: Nevada Complaint due to Fall while Ice Skating as a Result of Inattentiveness of Skating Instructor Description: In Nevada, ice skating is a popular recreational activity enjoyed by people of all ages and skill levels. However, there have been instances where individuals have experienced falls while ice skating due to the inattentiveness of their skating instructors. This detailed description highlights the various types of Nevada complaints related to falls during ice skating caused by the negligence of skating instructors. 1. Personal Injury Complaints: Individuals who have suffered injuries while ice skating due to the inattentiveness of their skating instructors can file personal injury complaints. These complaints highlight the physical harm caused, such as sprains, fractures, concussions, or other serious injuries resulting from falls on the ice. 2. Negligence Complaints: Skating instructors have a duty of care towards their students. When they fail to fulfill this duty by being inattentive or not providing proper supervision, negligence complaints can be filed. These complaints showcase how the instructor's lack of attention or failure to give timely instructions resulted in accidents and subsequent injuries. 3. Breach of Contract Complaints: In some cases, individuals may have signed contracts or waivers with skating rinks or ice skating facilities that clearly outline the responsibilities of the skating instructors. If an instructor exhibits inattentiveness that leads to a fall causing harm, individuals can pursue a breach of contract complaint against the facility for failing to provide the agreed-upon level of instruction and safety. 4. Professional Misconduct Complaints: Skating instructors hold a position of trust and responsibility. Professional misconduct complaints can be lodged against skating instructors who exhibit consistent inattentiveness, disregard for safety protocols, or fail to provide proper guidance during ice skating sessions, resulting in falls and injuries. It is important to note that these complaints vary in severity and can range from minor injuries to more severe cases of negligence. Individuals affected by such incidents should consult with legal professionals specializing in personal injury or negligence cases to assess their rights and pursue appropriate legal action. Keywords: Nevada, complaint, fall, ice skating, inattentiveness, skating instructor, personal injury, negligence, breach of contract, professional misconduct
