New Mexico Jury Instruction 2.2.3.2 Convicted Prisoner Alleging Deliberate Indifference To Serious Medical Need is a crucial legal guideline for cases involving convicted prisoners who claim deliberate indifference to their serious medical needs. This instruction provides clarity to the jury in determining whether the prison authorities exhibited deliberate indifference towards the prisoner's medical condition and if this indifference resulted in severe harm or further deterioration of their health. Keywords: New Mexico, jury instruction, convicted prisoner, deliberate indifference, serious medical need Different Types of New Mexico Jury Instruction 2.2.3.2 Convicted Prisoner Alleging Deliberate Indifference To Serious Medical Need: 1. Standard Instruction: This instruction sets the basic criteria and elements that need to be proven in a case where a convicted prisoner alleges deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. It outlines the burden of proof and the legal standards that the jury must consider during deliberations. 2. Elements of Deliberate Indifference: This component of the jury instruction delineates the essential elements that must be established to prove deliberate indifference. It explains that the plaintiff must show that the prison authorities were aware of the serious medical need and consciously disregarded it, resulting in harm or worsening of the prisoner's condition. 3. Definition of Serious Medical Need: This section provides a clear definition of what constitutes a serious medical need. It highlights medical conditions that, if left untreated or inadequately addressed, may lead to severe harm, permanent disability, or even death. It assists the jury in understanding the gravity of the situation and the potential consequences of deliberate indifference. 4. Evaluation of Prison Authority's Actions: This part instructs the jury to assess the actions (or lack thereof) taken by the prison authorities in response to the prisoner's medical need. It emphasizes that the plaintiff must prove that the authorities' response fell below the acceptable standard of care, indicating deliberate indifference rather than mere negligence or oversight. 5. Causal Relationship between Deliberate Indifference and Harm: This instruction clarifies that deliberate indifference must have directly caused or substantially contributed to the harm or worsening of the prisoner's medical condition. It guides the jury in considering whether there was a clear link between the deliberate indifference and the ultimate harm suffered by the prisoner. 6. Damages and Remedies: This component aids the jury in understanding the potential damages that can be awarded in cases of deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. It may include compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and any other relevant damages that the plaintiff can demonstrate. It is essential for legal professionals, jurors, and parties involved in cases of convicted prisoners alleging deliberate indifference to familiarize themselves with New Mexico Jury Instruction 2.2.3.2. These instructions ensure a fair and accurate assessment of the evidence presented while determining the liability of the prison authorities and the appropriate remedies for the affected prisoner.