The New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty To Mitigate In General is a crucial legal guideline provided to jurors during civil trials in the state of New Hampshire. This instruction emphasizes the obligation of a plaintiff to make reasonable efforts to minimize their damages or losses resulting from the defendant's actions. Keywords: New Hampshire, Jury Instruction, 1.1, Duty To Mitigate, General, civil trials. This particular jury instruction serves as a reminder to jurors that a plaintiff has a responsibility to take reasonable steps to mitigate their damages and prevent them from unnecessarily escalating. The duty to mitigate exists to ensure that plaintiffs are actively seeking to minimize the harm caused by the defendant's actions and to prevent them from seeking excessive compensation. The New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty To Mitigate In General highlights that if a plaintiff fails to reasonably attempt to mitigate their damages, the defendant's liability may be reduced. This means that if the plaintiff could have taken reasonable actions to reduce the negative impact of the defendant's actions but failed to do so, the jury can consider this in their assessment of damages. Different types of New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty To Mitigate may include: 1. Specific Situations of Duty To Mitigate: This type of instruction could address specific scenarios or circumstances where duty to mitigate becomes relevant. It may provide guidance on how the duty to mitigate applies to different types of cases, such as personal injury, property damage, contractual disputes, etc. 2. Burden of Proof: Another possible variation of this instruction could focus on the burden of proof regarding duty to mitigate. It would explain to the jury that the defendant has the burden to prove that the plaintiff failed to fulfill their duty to mitigate, and that this failure should result in a reduction of damages. 3. Factors to Consider: This type of instruction may provide a list of factors or considerations for jurors to evaluate whether the plaintiff has met their duty to mitigate. These factors may include the reasonableness of the actions taken by the plaintiff, the availability of alternatives, whether the plaintiff acted in good faith, etc. It is important to note that the specific types of New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty To Mitigate may vary depending on the nature of the case and the judge's discretion. The instructions are designed to provide jurors with a comprehensive understanding of the duty to mitigate principle and its application in civil trials.