You can devote time online attempting to find the legitimate file format which fits the federal and state requirements you want. US Legal Forms supplies thousands of legitimate types which can be reviewed by specialists. It is simple to down load or produce the North Carolina Jury Instruction - 3.3.1 Section 1, Per Se Violation Conspiracy To Fix Prices - Includes Alternative Rule of Reason Instruction from my services.
If you already possess a US Legal Forms profile, you may log in and click the Download option. After that, you may full, edit, produce, or indication the North Carolina Jury Instruction - 3.3.1 Section 1, Per Se Violation Conspiracy To Fix Prices - Includes Alternative Rule of Reason Instruction. Each legitimate file format you buy is yours eternally. To have another duplicate of the obtained type, visit the My Forms tab and click the related option.
If you use the US Legal Forms internet site for the first time, stick to the easy instructions beneath:
Download and produce thousands of file templates utilizing the US Legal Forms web site, that provides the most important collection of legitimate types. Use skilled and state-specific templates to deal with your organization or person demands.
You must decide whether the conspiracy charged in the indictment existed, and, if it did, who at least some of its members were. If you find that the conspiracy charged did not exist, then you must return a not guilty verdict, even though you may find that some other conspiracy existed.
Jury instructions are the only guidance the jury should receive when deliberating and are meant to keep the jury on track regarding the basic procedure of the deliberation and the substance of the law on which their decision is based.
Conspiracy applies to both civil and criminal offenses. For example, you may conspire to commit murder, or conspire to commit fraud.
The judge will advise the jury that it is the sole judge of the facts and of the credibility (believability) of witnesses. He or she will note that the jurors are to base their conclusions on the evidence as presented in the trial, and that the opening and closing arguments of the lawyers are not evidence.