Minnesota Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures is a legal maneuver used in court proceedings to prevent the admission of evidence related to any actions taken post-accident, injury, or damage that may suggest the defendant's acknowledgment of fault or liability. This motion aims to exclude any references or discussions regarding remedial measures undertaken by the defendant, as they could potentially bias the jury and unfairly impact the outcome of the trial. In the Minnesota legal system, there are different types of motions in liming that can be utilized to prevent evidence of remedial measures from being presented. These motions include: 1. Minnesota Motion in Liming to Exclude Evidence of Post-Accident Safety Measures: This motion seeks to prohibit the introduction of any evidence or testimony regarding safety precautions or modifications made by the defendant after the incident occurred. The argument is that such evidence can create a prejudicial bias in the jury's mind and should, therefore, be deemed inadmissible. 2. Minnesota Motion in Liming to Preclude Evidence of Corrective Actions: This motion aims to block any references to corrective actions or remedial measures taken by the defendant following an accident or injury. By preventing this evidence from being presented, the defense seeks to ensure that the focus of the trial remains solely on the facts and circumstances of the incident itself. 3. Minnesota Motion in Liming to Exclude Evidence of Repairs: This motion seeks to exclude any evidence pertaining to repairs or fixes made by the defendant after an accident or injury occurred. The argument presented is that introducing such evidence might create a misleading impression of acknowledgment of fault or liability, which can unfairly influence the jury's decision. In summary, a Minnesota Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures strives to restrict the admission of any evidence related to actions taken by the defendant after an accident, injury, or damage took place. By utilizing specific types of motions, such as those mentioned above, the defense aims to ensure a fair and unbiased trial by preventing the introduction of potentially prejudicial information.