You may devote hrs on the Internet looking for the authorized file design which fits the federal and state demands you need. US Legal Forms gives a huge number of authorized varieties that happen to be analyzed by professionals. It is possible to obtain or produce the Massachusetts Jury Instruction - Accomplice - Informer - Immunity from your assistance.
If you have a US Legal Forms accounts, you are able to log in and then click the Acquire option. Afterward, you are able to complete, revise, produce, or indicator the Massachusetts Jury Instruction - Accomplice - Informer - Immunity. Each authorized file design you acquire is the one you have permanently. To acquire an additional duplicate of any purchased kind, go to the My Forms tab and then click the corresponding option.
If you use the US Legal Forms site initially, stick to the simple guidelines below:
Acquire and produce a huge number of file themes using the US Legal Forms website, that provides the biggest selection of authorized varieties. Use specialist and state-particular themes to handle your organization or personal requires.
Reasonable doubt exists when you are not firmly convinced of the Defendant's guilt, after you have weighed and considered all the evidence. A Defendant must not be convicted on suspicion or speculation. It is not enough for the State to show that the Defendant is probably guilty.
In the Massachusetts state courts, juries can consist of either 6 people in the District Court or 12 people in the Superior Court, with 2 alternates for a 12-person jury and 1 alternate for a 6-person jury. The judge may impanel up to 16 jurors. In a criminal case, the verdict must be unanimous.
If you are not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of a charged crime, you must find the defendant not guilty of that crime. If you are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of a charged crime, you must find the defendant guilty of that crime. CPL 300.10(2).
Another example of reasonable doubt in a DUI case is if the arresting officer failed to follow proper procedure or they didn't have probable cause. If the defense can demonstrate that there were flaws or any form of negligence in the arrest, this may be enough to cast reasonable doubt on the guilt of the accused.
Your function as the jury is to determine the facts of this case. You alone determine what evidence you believe, how important any evidence is that you do believe, and what conclusions to draw from that evidence.
It is not required that the government prove guilt beyond all possible doubt. A reasonable doubt is a doubt based upon reason and common sense and is not based purely on speculation. It may arise from a careful and impartial consideration of all the evidence, or from lack of evidence.
In a criminal case, the prosecution bears the burden of proving that the defendant is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. This means that the prosecution must convince the jury that there is no other reasonable explanation that can come from the evidence presented at trial.
Specific intent means that ?a defendant must not only have consciously intended to take certain actions, but that he also consciously intended certain consequences.? Commonwealth v. Gunter, 427 Mass. 259, 269, 692 N.E.2d 515, 523 (1998).