If you wish to complete, download, or print sanctioned document templates, utilize US Legal Forms, the largest assortment of legal forms available online.
Take advantage of the site's user-friendly and efficient search to locate the documents you need.
Various templates for business and personal purposes are organized by categories and states, or keywords.
Step 4. Once you have found the form you need, click the Get now button. Select the payment plan you prefer and provide your details to register for your account.
Step 5. Process the transaction. You can use your credit card or PayPal account to complete the payment.
Rule 2.11 - Disqualification or Recusal (A) A judge shall disqualify or recuse himself or herself in any proceeding in which the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) The judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or a party's ...
Allows a party to seek disqualification of the assigned trial judge where the party feels he will not receive a fair trial or hearing because of a specifically described prejudice or bias of the judge.
455(a). There is, however, an exception to the ordinary recusal requirements, known as ?the rule of necessity,? which allows judges to hear a case in which virtually all other available judges would have the same disqualifying interest, and the case could not otherwise be heard.
A federal statute provides that any federal justice, judge, or magistrate shall recuse ?in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be ques- tioned,? 28 U.S.C. §455(a), as well as in specific, enumerated circumstances.
The general rule is that, to warrant recusal, a judge's expression of an opinion about the merits of a case, or his familiarity with the facts or the parties, must have originated in a source outside the case itself.
The judge is only required to order recusal (or refer the matter over to another judge to decide whether recusal is necessary) if a reasonable person, knowing all the facts, would have doubts about the judge's ability to be impartial in the case. See State v.
The rule of necessity is a judicial doctrine that permits a judge or agency decision maker to decide a case even if he or she would ordinarily be disqualified due to bias or prejudice .
There is, however, an exception to the ordinary recusal requirements, known as ?the rule of necessity,? which allows judges to hear a case in which virtually all other available judges would have the same disqualifying interest, and the case could not otherwise be heard.