The Indiana Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Inconsistent Statement and Felony Conviction — Defendant Testifies With No Felony Conviction is a crucial guideline that plays a significant role in Indiana's legal system. This instruction serves to guide jurors on how to evaluate the credibility and reliability of a witness or defendant who has made inconsistent statements and whether their prior felony conviction affects their testimony. In cases where a defendant testifies without having any prior felony conviction, this instruction becomes particularly relevant. It allows jurors to understand how inconsistencies in the defendant's own statements can impact their overall credibility. By carefully examining the defendant's testimony and comparing it to any prior contradictory statements, the jurors can determine whether the defendant is trustworthy and sincere in their defense. Keywords: Indiana Jury Instruction, Impeachment, Inconsistent Statement, Felony Conviction, Defendant Testifies, No Felony Conviction. Different types of Indiana Jury Instructions related to impeachment, inconsistent statements, and felony convictions may include: 1. Indiana Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Inconsistent Statement and Prior Conviction — Defendant Testifies With Prior Conviction: This instruction would be applicable when a defendant with a previous felony conviction testifies. Jurors would need to consider the impact of both the inconsistent statement and the prior conviction on the defendant's credibility. 2. Indiana Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Inconsistent Statement and Non-Felony Conviction — Defendant Testifies With Non-Felony Conviction: This instruction would be used when a defendant has a conviction for a non-felony offense. Jurors would need to assess the impact of the inconsistent statement and the non-felony conviction on the defendant's credibility. 3. Indiana Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Inconsistent Statement Only — Defendant Testifies With No Prior Conviction: Here, the focus would be solely on the inconsistent statement made by the defendant. Jurors need to determine whether the inconsistency affects the overall veracity of the defendant's testimony, despite the absence of any felony conviction. These varying instructions demonstrate the importance of carefully analyzing the relationship between inconsistent statements, prior convictions, and the credibility of the defendant's testimony in Indiana's legal system. Understanding and applying these instructions helps ensure fair and just verdicts by allowing jurors to make informed determinations based on relevant evidence.