Description: Indiana Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Inconsistent Statemen— - Defendant Testifies With No Felony Conviction refers to a legal instruction given to the jury during a trial in Indiana when a defendant testifies and has no prior felony convictions. This instruction allows the jury to consider inconsistencies between the defendant's current testimony and any prior statements made by the defendant. Keywords: Indiana, jury instruction, impeachment, inconsistent statement, defendant, testifies, felony conviction. There are different types of Indiana Jury Instruction — Impeachment — InconsistStateaNTm—nt - Defendant Testifies With No Felony Conviction: 1. Prior inconsistent statements: This type of instruction focuses on any prior statements made by the defendant that are inconsistent with their current testimony. The jury may use these inconsistencies to evaluate the defendant's credibility and determine the reliability of their testimony. 2. Absence of felony convictions: This instruction highlights the fact that the defendant has no prior felony convictions. It serves to establish the defendant's character and may influence the jury's perception of their credibility during the trial. 3. Evaluation of credibility: This instruction is aimed at helping the jury evaluate the credibility of the defendant's testimony by considering any inconsistent statements made throughout the trial. The purpose is to enable the jury to make an informed decision based on the reliability and trustworthiness of the defendant's statements. 4. Impact on the verdict: This instruction emphasizes that the jury should consider any inconsistencies in the defendant's testimony when deliberating on the verdict. The inconsistencies, especially if significant, may be considered in conjunction with other evidence to determine the defendant's guilt or innocence. In summary, the Indiana Jury Instruction — Impeachment — InconsistStatementem—n— - Defendant Testifies With No Felony Conviction provides guidance to the jury regarding the evaluation of a defendant's credibility when they have no prior felony convictions. It allows the jury to assess inconsistencies between the defendant's statements and make more informed decisions during the trial.