The Idaho Complaint for Writ of Habeas Corpus is a legal document filed in the state of Idaho to challenge the lawfulness of a person's detention or imprisonment. It serves as a means for individuals who believe they are wrongfully incarcerated or have been subjected to unlawful arrest to seek judicial review. Keywords: Idaho, Complaint, Writ of Habeas Corpus, legal document, challenge, detention, imprisonment, lawfulness, filed, individuals, wrongfully incarcerated, unlawful arrest, judicial review. There are different types of Idaho Complaint for Writ of Habeas Corpus based on the specific circumstances of the case: 1. Pretrial Detention: This type of complaint focuses on challenging the legality of a person's detention while awaiting trial. It may address issues such as unlawful arrest, lack of probable cause, or improper bail conditions. 2. Post-Conviction Relief: This complaint is filed after sentencing and aims to challenge the legality of the conviction or sentence. It may involve claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, constitutional violations, or new evidence that could potentially overturn the conviction. 3. Excessive Sentence: In some cases, individuals may file a complaint to challenge the length or severity of their sentence if they believe it is disproportionately harsh or violates their constitutional rights. 4. Execution Stay: This type of complaint is filed by individuals facing imminent execution. It seeks to halt the execution and raises issues such as new evidence, constitutional violations, or changes in the law that warrant a reexamination of the case. 5. Jurisdictional Challenges: In certain instances, a complaint for writ of habeas corpus may be filed to challenge the jurisdiction or authority of the court or agency responsible for the detention or imprisonment. It questions the legality of the entire process from the beginning. It is important to consult with an experienced attorney to determine the appropriate type of Idaho Complaint for Writ of Habeas Corpus to file and to ensure that all relevant legal arguments and evidence are appropriately addressed.