Hawaii Jury Instruction — 1.3 Duty To Mitigate In General Pursuing Medical Care: A Comprehensive Explanation Keywords: Hawaii jury instruction, duty to mitigate, pursuing medical care, legal responsibilities, personal injury claim Introduction: In a personal injury claim in Hawaii, it is important to understand the concept of duty to mitigate, specifically when it comes to pursuing medical care. Hawaii Jury Instruction — 1.3 addresses this duty and guides the jury in determining the defendant's liability while considering the plaintiff's responsibility in seeking proper medical treatment. This article will provide a detailed description of Hawaii Jury Instruction — 1.3 Duty To Mitigate In General Pursuing Medical Care, its significance, and potential variations. 1. Overview of Hawaii Jury Instruction — 1.3: Hawaii JurInstructionio— - 1.3 encompasses the duty imposed upon plaintiffs to mitigate their damages after sustaining injuries due to the negligence or intentional act of the defendant. It highlights the importance of seeking reasonable and necessary medical care and the implications it may have on the compensation awarded in a personal injury case. 2. The Duty to Mitigate: The duty to mitigate requires the injured party to make reasonable efforts to lessen the severity and consequences of their injuries. In the context of pursuing medical care, this duty indicates that the plaintiff should seek necessary medical attention promptly, follow recommended treatment plans, and take reasonable steps to recover or avoid worsening their condition. 3. Purpose of Pursuing Medical Care: The duty to mitigate through pursuing medical care is twofold. First, it aims to ensure the injured party receives appropriate treatment to recover fully or reach maximum improvement from their injuries. Second, it mitigates potential damages claimed by the plaintiff, as their failure to seek timely medical care may imply the injuries were not as severe as portrayed. 4. Variations of Hawaii Jury Instruction — 1.3: a. Hawaii JurInstructionio— - 1.3(a) — Prompt Medical Care: This variation of the instruction emphasizes the importance of the injured party seeking immediate medical care following an incident that caused their injuries. It outlines the consequences of delayed treatment and highlights the need for a timely response to minimize potential harm. b. Hawaii Jury Instruction — 1.3(b— - Recommended Treatment Plan: This variation addresses situations where medical professionals prescribe a specific treatment plan or course of action. It illuminates the plaintiff's duty to adhere to these recommendations reasonably, as non-compliance may adversely affect their claim. c. Hawaii Jury Instruction — 1.3(c— - Avoiding Aggravation of Injury: In cases where the plaintiff disregards the advice provided by medical professionals, this variant emphasizes the duty to avoid actions that may worsen or exacerbate the existing injuries. It underscores the plaintiff's obligation to follow precautions or restrictions to prevent any further harm. Conclusion: Hawaii Jury Instruction — 1.3 Duty To Mitigate In General Pursuing Medical Care is an essential aspect of personal injury law. To maximize their chances of receiving fair compensation, injured individuals must understand their duty to mitigate, which involves seeking appropriate medical care promptly, complying with recommended treatment plans, and avoiding actions that aggravate their injuries. It is crucial to consider the various variations of this instruction, such as prompt medical care, recommended treatment plans, and avoiding injury aggravation, to meet the legal responsibilities associated with a personal injury claim in Hawaii.