Georgia Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal concept that is often used in personal injury cases in Georgia. This jury instruction is designed to guide jurors in determining the degree of fault for each party involved in the accident or incident, and how that fault should be allocated when considering damages. In Georgia, there are different types of Comparative Negligence Defense instructions that may be presented to the jury based on the specific circumstances of the case. Some of these instructions include: 1. Primary Comparative Negligence: This instruction is commonly used in Georgia courts and follows the principle of comparative negligence, which means that each party's negligence, or fault, is compared to determine their proportional share of responsibility for the accident or incident. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence: This instruction is also frequently used and is slightly different from primary comparative negligence. Under this instruction, if the injured party is found to be 50% or more at fault for the accident, they are barred from recovering any damages. However, if their level of fault is found to be below 50%, their damages will be reduced by their proportion of fault. 3. Pure Comparative Negligence: This instruction is less common but may still be used in certain cases. Under this instruction, the injured party's damages are reduced by their proportion of fault, regardless of the level of fault assigned. 4. Last Clear Chance Doctrine: This instruction applies when a plaintiff's own negligence contributes to the accident, but the defendant had the last clear chance to avoid the accident or mitigate its harmful effects. In such cases, the plaintiff may still recover damages even if they were partially at fault. The goal of providing these different instructions is to ensure that the jury considers all relevant evidence and accurately determines the proportionate fault for each party, ultimately resulting in a fair allocation of damages. It is important for jurors to carefully consider the evidence, testimony, and expert opinions presented during the trial, as well as the specific jury instructions given by the judge, to make an informed decision. In conclusion, the Georgia Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense is an essential tool used in personal injury cases to guide jurors in determining the proportionate fault of each party involved. With different types of instructions available, it is crucial for jurors to carefully consider the evidence and instructions to reach a fair and just verdict.