Connecticut Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use: A Detailed Description In Connecticut, a Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use aims to exclude any mention, evidence, or arguments related to the use or non-use of seat belts in a court case. This motion is typically filed by defense attorneys in personal injury cases where the plaintiff's failure to wear a seat belt might be used against them by the opposing party. The primary purpose of filing this motion is to preclude any references to seat belt use during the trial, preventing it from influencing the jury's perception of the case. By requesting the court to exclude such evidence, the defense seeks to avoid any potential bias or prejudice that could arise from discussing the plaintiff's seat belt usage. To strengthen the motion, defense attorneys often rely on Connecticut's seat belt law, which follows a comparative negligence system. In Connecticut, failure to wear a seat belt is not admissible as evidence to prove negligence or to diminish damages in a civil case. The law holds that the non-use of a seat belt does not constitute negligence on its own, thereby making it irrelevant to the determination of liability or damages. Different types of Connecticut Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use may include: 1. Traditional Motion: This motion seeks a general prohibition on any reference to seat belt use throughout the trial. It aims to exclude any testimony, visuals, or discussion related to the plaintiff's seat belt usage from being presented before the jury. 2. Limited Motion: In certain cases, the defense may file a limited motion to exclude seat belt evidence only during specific stages of the trial, such as opening statements, witness examinations, or closing arguments. This motion limits the scope of seat belt references while still achieving the objective of avoiding potential prejudice. 3. Partial Motion: A partial motion may seek the exclusion of seat belt evidence related to certain defendants or witnesses, rather than a blanket prohibition. This type of motion may be relevant when multiple parties are involved in the case, and the seat belt issues are specific to selected individuals. It is important to note that the filing and success of a Connecticut Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use may vary depending on the specifics of each case and the discretion of the judge presiding over it. Adequate legal research, proper citation of relevant Connecticut statutes and case law, and persuasive argumentation are crucial in presenting a strong motion that effectively shields seat belt references during trial proceedings.