Connecticut Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty To Mitigate In General: A Detailed Description Introduction: Connecticut Jury Instruction — 1.1 refers to the duty to mitigate damages in a civil lawsuit. When a plaintiff suffers harm or injury due to the actions of a defendant, they have an obligation to take reasonable measures to minimize or reduce the extent of those damages. This instruction helps the jury understand the plaintiff's duty to mitigate and its significance in determining the compensation to be awarded. Keywords: — Connecticut jurinstructionio— - Duty to mitigate — General duty to mitigate damage— - Civil lawsuit — Harm or injury - Defendan— - Plaintiff — Reasonable measures - Minimize damages — Compensation Description: 1. Purpose and Importance of Connecticut Jury Instruction — 1.1: Connecticut JurInstructionio— - 1.1 "Duty To Mitigate In General" serves as a guideline for the jury to evaluate the plaintiff's actions after harm or injury has been inflicted. This instruction emphasizes that a plaintiff cannot simply allow damages to increase unnecessarily but must act reasonably to minimize the impact of the harm caused. 2. Duty to Mitigate: The duty to mitigate, as described in Connecticut Jury Instruction — 1.1, requires the jury to consider whether the plaintiff made sensible efforts to reduce their damages once the harm occurred. The purpose of this duty is to prevent a plaintiff from claiming an unreasonably large amount of compensation for the harm suffered, which could result in unfairness to the defendant. 3. The Plaintiff's Obligation: Connecticut Jury Instruction — 1.1 clarifies that the plaintiff has a legal obligation to take reasonable steps to mitigate their damages. This may include seeking medical treatment promptly, following prescribed treatment plans diligently, and actively seeking alternative employment opportunities if their ability to work is impacted. 4. Reasonable and Prudent Behavior: The jury must determine whether the plaintiff took actions that an ordinary person with similar circumstances would have taken to minimize damages. If the plaintiff failed to meet this standard, it may result in a reduction of the compensation awarded, reflecting the extent to which the damages could have been mitigated. 5. Types of Connecticut Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty To Mitigate: While the general duty to mitigate is encompassed in Connecticut Jury Instruction — 1.1, there may be specific situations where the duty to mitigate requires separate instructions. For example: a. Duty to Mitigate in Employment Matters: In cases involving wrongful termination or workplace harassment, specific instructions may be provided to guide the jury regarding the plaintiff's duty to actively search for alternative employment to minimize loss of income. b. Duty to Mitigate in Personal Injury Cases: Instructions might be modified to address the plaintiff's duty to seek medical treatment promptly and follow doctors' advice to minimize the long-term impact of their injuries and related damages. Conclusion: Connecticut Jury Instruction — 1.1 "Duty To Mitigate In General" highlights the responsibility of plaintiffs to take reasonable steps to minimize damages and prevent unnecessary harm. By considering the plaintiff's actions in mitigating damages, the jury can ensure a fair and just compensation is awarded based on the actual losses suffered.