Alaska Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense: The Alaska Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal guideline provided to the jury during a civil trial in Alaska. It specifically addresses the concept of comparative negligence, which allows for the allocation of fault and damages among multiple parties involved in a negligence claim. Keywords: 1. Alaska Jury Instruction: This refers to a set of guidelines and instructions provided by the court to guide the jury in understanding the applicable law during a trial. 2. Comparative Negligence Defense: Comparative negligence is a legal principle that allows a jury to assign a percentage of fault to each party involved in a lawsuit. It assesses the extent to which the actions or inaction of each party contributed to the damages suffered by the plaintiff. Different types of Alaska Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense: 1. Pure Comparative Negligence: This type of comparative negligence defense is used in Alaska. It allows the jury to assign fault and allocate damages proportionally, even if the plaintiff is more than 50% at fault. In such cases, the plaintiff's recovery is reduced by their allocated percentage of fault. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence: Under this approach, the plaintiff can only recover damages if they are found to be less at fault than the defendant(s). If the plaintiff is deemed 50% or more at fault, they are barred from recovering any damages. The Alaska Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense helps the jury understand how to apply the principle of comparative negligence when determining liability and awarding damages in a civil lawsuit. It serves as a crucial tool in ensuring fair and just outcomes in personal injury cases. It allows the jury to carefully evaluate the evidence presented and apportion responsibility accordingly, considering each party's level of negligence.