Alaska Reasonable Doubt by Single Juror is a legal term used in the Alaskan judiciary system to define a particular situation where a single juror is uncertain about the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. This concept plays a crucial role in criminal trials as it safeguards the defendant's presumption of innocence until proven guilty. In Alaska, a unanimous jury verdict is not required for conviction except in cases that seek the death penalty. Under Alaska Statute 12.70.050, a defendant can be convicted by a majority vote of the jury, with the exception that no fewer than 10 out of 12 jurors should agree on the verdict. However, if a single juror has reasonable doubt about the defendant's guilt, it can result in a hung jury or mistrial. The term "Alaska Reasonable Doubt by Single Juror" signifies the significance and influence a single juror holds in determining the outcome of a trial. It emphasizes the cautiousness and high standards required to convict an individual of a crime. A single juror withholding their vote due to reasonable doubt has the potential to sway the decision towards acquittal or the inability to reach a verdict. Different types or scenarios of Alaska Reasonable Doubt by Single Juror may include situations where a juror strongly believes in the defendant's innocence despite the evidence presented in court. It could also arise when a juror questions the credibility or reliability of key witnesses, suspecting inconsistencies in their testimonies. Another instance might be where a juror has personal biases or reservations about the reliability of forensic evidence. Alaska Reasonable Doubt by Single Juror underscores the significance of impartial deliberations and highlights the value of diverse perspectives within the jury. It embodies the principle that even a single juror's reasonable doubt can act as a safeguard, preventing the potential conviction of an innocent person.