Sia Building Contract 2016 Without Quantities In Suffolk
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
There are three main types of contract that use the SIA Conditions, namely: the Lump Sum Contract; Measurement Contract; and. Minor Works Contract.
Standard-form contracts are pre-drafted templates with standard terms and conditions popular in similar transactions. By using a standard form, parties can save time and resources negotiating individual contract terms. It can be especially beneficial in industries with frequent transactions and similar terms.
What is a standard form contract? While many contracts are entirely purpose made, standard form contracts consist of standardised, pre-written terms and conditions. Because standard form contracts are familiar to people in an industry, they often function effectively without the need for much negotiation.
A standard form contract will typically be one prepared by one party to the contract and not negotiated between the parties—it is offered on a 'take it or leave it' basis.
The JCT Standard Building Contract is designed for large or complex construction projects where detailed contract provisions are needed. Standard Building Contracts are suitable for projects procured via the traditional or conventional method.
Standard Form Contracts are agreements that employ standardised, non-negotiated provisions, usually in pre-printed forms. These are sometimes referred to as 'boilerplate contracts', 'contracts of adhesion', or 'take it or leave it' contracts.
The employer must provide drawings together with a description of works, and either a specification or work schedules at tender stage. The project is generally not complex enough to require bills of quantities.
Singapore predominantly uses lump-sum contracts. As many domestic projects are for building works, these are mostly tendered on a 'build-only'/'construct-only' procurement model, followed by 'design and build' procurement models where the contractor's specialist experience is more critical.
At a greater level of detail, JCT provides a number of subjective tests for determining if certain events give grounds for recompense to the contractor, whereas NEC generally relies on more objective tests.
