A form of publication which tends to cause one to lose the esteem of the community is defamation. This is injury to reputation. A person can be held liable for the defamation of another. In order to prove defamation, the plaintiff must prove:
- that a statement was made about the plaintiff's reputation, honesty or integrity that is not true;
- publication to a third party (i.e., another person hears or reads the statement); and
- the plaintiff suffers damages as a result of the statement.
Slander is a form of defamation that consists of making false oral statements about a person which would damage that person's reputation. If one spreads a rumor that his neighbor has been in jail and this is not true, the person making such false statements could be held liable for slander.
Defamation which occurs by written statements is known as libel. Libel also may result from a picture or visual representation. Truth is an absolute defense to slander or libel.
Some statements, while libelous or slanderous, are absolutely privileged in the sense that the statements can be made without fear of a lawsuit for slander. The best example is statements made in a court of law. An untrue statement made about a person in court which damages that person's reputation will generally not cause liability to the speaker as far as slander is concerned. However, if the statement is untrue, the person making it may be liable for criminal perjury.
If a communication is made in good faith on a subject in which the party communicating it has a legitimate right or interest in communicating it, this communication may be exempt from slander liability due to a qualified privileged.
The following form letter demands that someone cease making libelous or slanderous statements, or appropriate legal action will be taken.
Defamation Document Within The Workplace In Travis
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Travis
Control #:
US-00423BG
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
The elements necessary to establish defamation at the workplace include: A false, defamatory statement about an employee. The unauthorized publication or communication of such statement to a third party. Fault on part of the individual who made the statement, either intentional or at least negligent.
A defamation case arises when a person or organisation believes their reputation has been damaged by a statement or publication and they take legal action against the person responsible - known as "suing for defamation".
Johnny Depp vs. This case between movie star Johnny Depp and his ex-wife, actress Amber Heard, was one of the most publicized defamation cases in recent times. The defendant, Ms. Heard, published an article in the Washington Post that insinuated that her ex-husband, Depp, had been violent towards her.
S. Shreya Singhal vs U.O.I on 24 March, 2015. Subramanian Swamy vs Union Of India, Min. Jeffrey J.Diermeier & Anr vs State Of West Bengal & Anr on 14 May, 2010. Balraj Khanna & Ors vs Moti Ram on 22 April, 1971. Melepurath Sankunni Ezhuthassan vs Thekittil Gopalankutty Nair on 29 November, 1985.
For example, if someone spreads a false rumor about a person's professional conduct that leads to job loss or social stigma, it qualifies as defamation. Another example could be a newspaper publishing false claims about a celebrity's behavior that results in loss of endorsements.
Examples of social media defamation Sharing a video that includes untrue comments about an individual, with the purpose of defaming them and causing harm to their reputation. Leaving a Google review that is false and aimed at tarnishing the reputation of a business.
Be Genuine An apology that does not accompany a retraction may appear disingenuous. Offering to make an apology is not the same as making one. A private and confidential apology will do little to reduce reputational harm. Likewise, an apology should not further defame.
The Aspects of a Professional Apology Acknowledging the mistake. Expressing regret and taking responsibility. Proposing solutions and corrective actions. Asking for forgiveness and closing. Nonverbal communication and body language. Apologies in emails. Apologizing in person. Remote apology.
An apology should be well-timed. An apology that is published soon after the initial libel will in almost all cases be better at reducing damage. The time of day of a publication may matter. Ideally, an apology should reach the same audience as the original libel.
