A form of publication which tends to cause one to lose the esteem of the community is defamation. This is injury to reputation. A person can be held liable for the defamation of another. In order to prove defamation, the plaintiff must prove:
- that a statement was made about the plaintiff's reputation, honesty or integrity that is not true;
- publication to a third party (i.e., another person hears or reads the statement); and
- the plaintiff suffers damages as a result of the statement.
Slander is a form of defamation that consists of making false oral statements about a person which would damage that person's reputation. If one spreads a rumor that his neighbor has been in jail and this is not true, the person making such false statements could be held liable for slander.
Defamation which occurs by written statements is known as libel. Libel also may result from a picture or visual representation. Truth is an absolute defense to slander or libel.
Some statements, while libelous or slanderous, are absolutely privileged in the sense that the statements can be made without fear of a lawsuit for slander. The best example is statements made in a court of law. An untrue statement made about a person in court which damages that person's reputation will generally not cause liability to the speaker as far as slander is concerned. However, if the statement is untrue, the person making it may be liable for criminal perjury.
If a communication is made in good faith on a subject in which the party communicating it has a legitimate right or interest in communicating it, this communication may be exempt from slander liability due to a qualified privileged.
The following form letter demands that someone cease making libelous or slanderous statements, or appropriate legal action will be taken.
Slander And Libel In Canada In Suffolk
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Suffolk
Control #:
US-00423BG
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
In Canadian common law jurisdictions, the plaintiff in a defamation claim must prove three elements: (1) that the impugned words were defamatory, in the sense that they would tend to lower the plaintiff's reputation in the eyes of a reasonable person; (2) that the words were in fact referred to the plaintiff; and (3) ...
Every one who publishes a defamatory libel that he knows is false is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
To prove slander in Canada, the following elements must be satisfied: The statement was made verbally. The statement was made to a third party (i.e., someone other than the person being defamed) The statement was false. The statement caused harm to the reputation of the individual or organization.
It is very difficult to sue for defamation and you will need a lawyer to assist you in court. To prove slander, you must show that the statements were heard by a third party. A rude remark made only to you is not defamation if no third party heard it.
At common law, a libel plaintiff has the onus of proving on a balance of probabilities: (1) the impugned expression would tend to lower his or her reputation in the eyes of a reasonable person; (2) the expression referred to the plaintiff; and (3) the expression was communicated to at least one person other than the ...
The burden of proving all the elements of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt remains with the Crown (R. v. Osolin, 1993 4 S.C.R. 595, with respect to the "air of reality" test).
Generally, to prove defamation, you must show that a false statement was made, about you, to third parties, and which caused you damage. Once you have evaluated your case, and determined that you can satisfy these elements, you can then proceed with pursuing your matter.
Aside from the Criminal Code, a person or a company that is damaged by a libelous or defamatory act may also sue under their respective provincial legislations on defamation, libel, and slander. Some of these legislations are: Ontario: Libel and Slander Act. British Columbia: Libel and Slander Act.
More info
620, 622 (1999) ("the Supreme Court of Canada has explicitly refused to follow the American lead in the libel context. The communication must be made to other people, not just conveyed privately.If defamation is spoken, it's called slander. Does your jurisdiction distinguish between libel and slander? As for the difference between slander and libel, spoken defamation is slander; published or broadcast defamation is libel. Defamation cases have been on the rise in Canada. Types of Defamatory Statements: Slander and Libel. To prevail in a defamation suit, whether for libel or slander, the plaintiff must show: That the statements in dispute are defamatory.
